Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria

被引:607
作者
Evers, S
Goossens, M
de Vet, H
van Tulder, M
Ament, A
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Inst Rehabil Res, Dept Hlth Org Policy & Econ, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Inst Rehabil Res, Dept Med Clin & Expt Psychol, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] VU Univ Med Ctr, Inst Res Extramural Med, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
review; systematic; cost and cost analysis; Delphi technique; quality assurance; health care; evidence based medicine;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462305050324
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The aim of the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) project is to develop a criteria list for assessment of the methodological quality of economic evaluations in systematic reviews. The criteria list resulting from this CHEC project should be regarded as a minimum standard. Methods: The criteria list has been developed using a Delphi method. Three Delphi rounds were needed to reach consensus. Twenty-three international experts participated in the Delphi panel. Results: The Delphi panel achieved consensus over a generic core set of items for the quality assessment of economic evaluations. Each item of the CHEC-list was formulated as a question that can be answered by yes or no. To standardize the interpretation of the list and facilitate its use, the project team also provided an operationalization of the criteria list items. Conclusions: There was consensus among a group of international experts regarding a core set of items that can be used to assess the quality of economic evaluations in systematic reviews. Using this checklist will make future systematic reviews of economic evaluations more transparent, informative, and comparable. Consequently, researchers and policy-makers might use these systematic reviews more easily. The CHEC-list can be downloaded freely from http://www.beoz.unimaas.nl/chec/.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 245
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS IN RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS [J].
ADAMS, ME ;
MCCALL, NT ;
GRAY, DT ;
ORZA, MJ ;
CHALMERS, TC .
MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (03) :231-243
[2]  
AMENT A, 2002, EVIDENCE BASED HLTH, P99
[3]   Methodologic evaluation of the radiology cost-effectiveness literature [J].
Blackmore, CC ;
Magid, DJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (01) :87-91
[4]   QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS IN SELECTED PHARMACY, MEDICAL, AND HEALTH ECONOMICS JOURNALS [J].
BRADLEY, CA ;
ISKEDJIAN, M ;
LANCTOT, KL ;
MITTMANN, N ;
SIMONE, C ;
STPIERRE, E ;
MILLER, E ;
BLATMAN, B ;
CHABURSKY, B ;
EINARSON, TR .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1995, 29 (7-8) :681-689
[5]  
BUXTON MA, 1997, CANADIAN EXPERIENCE
[6]   METHODOLOGICAL AND CONDUCT PRINCIPLES FOR PHARMACOECONOMIC RESEARCH [J].
CLEMENS, K ;
TOWNSEND, R ;
LUSCOMBE, F ;
MAUSKOPF, J ;
OSTERHAUS, J ;
BOBULA, J .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1995, 8 (02) :169-174
[7]  
Detsky A S, 1993, Pharmacoeconomics, V3, P354, DOI 10.2165/00019053-199303050-00003
[8]  
Drummond M, 1993, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, V9, P26
[9]  
Drummond M., 2015, METHODS EC EVALUATIO, V4
[10]   Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ [J].
Drummond, MF ;
Jefferson, TO .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7052) :275-283