The ethics of accountability in managed care reform

被引:200
作者
Daniels, N [1 ]
Sabin, J
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Dept Philosophy, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.17.5.50
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Two notions of accountability embodied in proposals to reform managed care have different ethical implications. Market accountability requires plans to inform purchasers and consumers about performance and options, in theory legitimizing limits to care through consumer choice. Recognizing the limits of consumer choice, accountability for reasonableness requires that the rationales for limits to services be public and be based on reasons or rules that "fair-minded" people can agree are relevant to pursuing appropriate patient care under necessary resource constraints. Accountability for reasonableness educates clinicians and patients about the need for limits and empowers a more focused public deliberation in which ultimate authority for limiting care rests with democratic processes.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 64
页数:15
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
ARROW KJ, 1963, AM ECON REV, V53, P941
[2]   Closure, fair procedures, and setting limits within managed care organizations [J].
Daniels, N ;
Sabin, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1998, 46 (03) :351-354
[3]   Last chance therapies and managed care - Pluralism, fair procedures, and legitimacy [J].
Daniels, N ;
Sabin, JE .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1998, 28 (02) :27-41
[4]   Limits to health care: Fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers [J].
Daniels, N ;
Sabin, J .
PHILOSOPHY & PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 1997, 26 (04) :303-350
[5]  
Daniels N., 1996, JUSTICE JUSTIFICATIO
[6]  
Daniels Norman., 1985, Just Health Care
[7]  
HAM C, 1998, TRAGIC CHOICES HLTH
[8]  
LIGHT D, 1996, BENCHMARKS FAIRNESS
[9]  
RODWIN MA, 1997, AM PROSPECT, V34, P45
[10]  
SITDUVALL M, 1998, HOUSTON CHRONIC 0616