The aerodynamics of hovering flight in Drosophila

被引:250
作者
Fry, SN [1 ]
Sayaman, R
Dickinson, MH
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, ETH, Inst Neuroinformat, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] CALTECH, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
关键词
fruit fly; Drosophila melanogaster; flight; aerodynamics; power; biomechanics; behavior;
D O I
10.1242/jeb.01612
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Using 3D infrared high-speed video, we captured the continuous wing and body kinematics of free-flying fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, during hovering and slow forward flight. We then 'replayed' the wing kinematics on a dynamically scaled robotic model to measure the aerodynamic forces produced by the wings. Hovering animals generate a U-shaped wing trajectory, in which large drag forces during a downward plunge at the start of each stroke create peak vertical forces. Quasi-steady mechanisms could account for nearly all of the mean measured force required to hover, although temporal discrepancies between instantaneous measured forces and model predictions indicate that unsteady mechanisms also play a significant role. We analyzed the requirements for hovering from an analysis of the time history of forces and moments in all six degrees of freedom. The wing kinematics necessary to generate sufficient lift are highly constrained by the requirement to balance thrust and pitch torque over the stroke cycle. We also compare the wing motion and aerodynamic forces of free and tethered flies. Tethering causes a strong distortion of the stroke pattern that results in a reduction of translational forces and a prominent nose-down pitch moment. The stereotyped distortion under tethered conditions is most likely due to a disruption of sensory feedback. Finally, we calculated flight power based directly on the measurements of wing motion and aerodynamic forces, which yielded a higher estimate of muscle power during free hovering flight than prior estimates based on time-averaged parameters. This discrepancy is mostly due to a two- to threefold underestimate of the mean profile drag coefficient in prior studies. We also compared our values with the predictions of the same time-averaged models using more accurate kinematic and aerodynamic input parameters based on our high-speed videography measurements. In this case, the time-averaged models tended to overestimate flight costs.
引用
收藏
页码:2303 / 2318
页数:16
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Balint CN, 2001, J EXP BIOL, V204, P4213
[2]   Neuromuscular control of aerodynamic forces and moments in the blowfly, Calliphora vicina [J].
Balint, CN ;
Dickinson, MH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 207 (22) :3813-3838
[3]   Spanwise flow and the attachment of the leading-edge vortex on insect wings [J].
Birch, JM ;
Dickinson, MH .
NATURE, 2001, 412 (6848) :729-733
[4]   The influence of wing-wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight [J].
Birch, JM ;
Dickinson, MH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2003, 206 (13) :2257-2272
[5]   Force production and flow structure of the leading edge vortex on flapping wings at high and low Reynolds numbers [J].
Birch, JM ;
Dickson, WB ;
Dickinson, MH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 207 (07) :1063-1072
[6]  
BUCKHOLZ RH, 1981, J EXP BIOL, V90, P163
[7]  
CLOUPEAU M, 1979, J EXP BIOL, V80, P1
[8]   SMOOTHING NOISY DATA WITH SPLINE FUNCTIONS [J].
WAHBA, G .
NUMERISCHE MATHEMATIK, 1975, 24 (05) :383-393
[9]   COMPENSATION FOR HEIGHT IN THE CONTROL OF GROUNDSPEED BY DROSOPHILA IN A NEW, BARBERS POLE WIND-TUNNEL [J].
DAVID, CT .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 147 (04) :485-493
[10]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BODY ANGLE AND FLIGHT SPEED IN FREE-FLYING DROSOPHILA [J].
DAVID, CT .
PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1978, 3 (03) :191-195