Economic evaluation of four angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension

被引:11
作者
Miller, Lesley-Ann [2 ]
Wade, Rolin [3 ]
Dai, Dingwei [3 ]
Cziraky, Mark J. [3 ]
Ramaswamy, Krishnan [1 ]
Panjabi, Sumeet [1 ]
机构
[1] Daiichi Sankyo Inc, Parsippany, NJ 07054 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Drug Use Policy & Pharmacoecon, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] HealthCore Inc, Wilmington, DE USA
关键词
Angiotensin II receptor blockers; Cost effectiveness; Irbesartan; Losartan; Olmesartan; Valsartan; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; BLOOD-PRESSURE; SAMPLE-SIZES; DRUG-THERAPY; LOSARTAN; VALSARTAN; PERSISTENCE; ANTAGONISTS; IRBESARTAN; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1185/03007991003711045
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of achieving JNC 7 blood pressure goals with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). Research design and methods: Cost effectiveness of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan was compared with real world patient chart and claims data from a large US health plan. Patients 18 and older with >= 2 claims for an ARB between May 1, 2002 and December 31, 2005 were identified from the claims database. Patients with a diagnosis of hypertension in the 6-month baseline period before the first (index) ARB claim and ARB-free during baseline were included. Medical charts were randomly sampled from the cohort of identified patients; effectiveness data were obtained from charts and linked to healthcare claims and costs. These data were used to populate the decision analytic model. Main outcome measures: All-cause and hypertension-attributable costs to achieve JNC 7 goals were measured. Comparisons were made within low and high-dose strata and pooled across ARB doses. Results: 121 472 patients were identified, and charts were randomly abstracted for 1600. Of these, 1293 patients were hypertensive at index. Baseline patient characteristics for the chart group were modestly different from the larger cohort. More patients treated with olmesartan (77.8%) than with losartan (66.5%), valasartan (68.8%), or irbesartan (68.8%) achieved JNC 7 BP goals. In pooled-dose comparisons, cost per patient reaching BP goal was $8964 (all-cause) and $2704 (hypertension-attributable) for olmesartan; compared with $10 848 and $3291 for losartan; $10 557 and $3577 for valsartan; and $13395 and $4325 for irbesartan, respectively. The trend was similar for the dose stratification analysis, except in the comparison between high-dose losartan and olmesartan, where losartan had a lower cost-effectiveness ratio. Conclusion: Overall olmesartan was the most effective and cost-saving treatment option compared to losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan for the achievement of JNC 7 BP goals in this managed-care population.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1320
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2009 [J].
不详 .
DIABETES CARE, 2009, 32 :S13-S61
[2]  
Anderson AN, 2000, S AFR MED J, V90, P494
[3]  
BALL KJ, 2001, J HYPERTENS S1, V19, P49
[4]   Cost Effectiveness of Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Monotherapy in Patients with Hypertension in the Netherlands A Comparative Analysis Using Clinical Trial and Drug Utilization Data [J].
Boersma, Cornelis ;
Voors, Adriaan A. ;
Visser, Sipke T. ;
de Jong-van den Berg, Lolkje T. W. ;
Postma, Maarten J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS, 2010, 10 (01) :49-54
[5]   Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy [J].
Brenner, BM ;
Cooper, ME ;
de Zeeuw, D ;
Keane, WF ;
Mitch, WE ;
Parving, HH ;
Remuzzi, G ;
Snapinn, SM ;
Zhang, ZX ;
Shahinfar, S .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (12) :861-869
[6]   Handling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness models [J].
Briggs, AH .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2000, 17 (05) :479-500
[7]   ESTIMATING SAMPLE SIZES FOR BINARY, ORDERED CATEGORICAL, AND CONTINUOUS OUTCOMES IN 2 GROUP COMPARISONS [J].
CAMPBELL, MJ ;
JULIOUS, SA ;
ALTMAN, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7013) :1145-1148
[8]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[9]   ADAPTING A CLINICAL COMORBIDITY INDEX FOR USE WITH ICD-9-CM ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES [J].
DEYO, RA ;
CHERKIN, DC ;
CIOL, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (06) :613-619
[10]   Persistence, adherence, and risk of discontinuation associated with commonly prescribed antihypertensive drug monotherapies [J].
Elliott, William J. ;
Plauschinat, Craig A. ;
Skrepnek, Grant H. ;
Gause, Douglas .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2007, 20 (01) :72-80