Costs of Water Quality Goals under Climate Change in Urbanizing Watersheds: Difficult Run, Virginia

被引:11
作者
Giuffria, Jonathon M. [1 ]
Bosch, Darrell J. [1 ]
Taylor, Daniel B. [1 ]
Alamdari, Nasrin [2 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Agr & Appl Econ, 308 Hutcheson Hall,250 Drillfield Dr, Blacksburg, VA 24060 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24060 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CHESAPEAKE BAY; MANAGEMENT; HYPOXIA; EUTROPHICATION; IMPLEMENTATION; TERM;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000782
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Reducing nutrient loadings in urban areas is important for water quality improvement programs in many watersheds. Urban nutrient loadings are expected to increase and become more variable under climate change (CC). In this study, a water quality simulation model (SWMM), land cover data layers, and mathematical programming models were used to compare costs of abating nutrient loads under CC in the Difficult Run Watershed located in Fairfax County, Virginia. Predicted costs of abating mean total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and total suspended sediment (TSS) loadings under current climate conditions were compared with those for CC under certainty with a Cost Minimization Model and under uncertainty with a Safety First Model. Total nitrogen loadings abatement had the highest cost followed by TP and TSS abatement in that order. Costs of controlling TP and TSS increased with CC, whereas there was little change in TN control costs. Introducing uncertainty of loadings caused control costs to increase substantially for all three pollutants. The preferred pollutant control strategy was urban stream restoration. Policy makers seeking to meet water quality goals over a multiyear horizon should consider frontloading supplemental best management practices (BMPs) to offset the changes in nutrient loadings predicted for CC. (C) 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Climate change and dead zones [J].
Altieri, Andrew H. ;
Gedan, Keryn B. .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2015, 21 (04) :1395-1406
[2]  
[Anonymous], ARCMAP 10 3 1 COMP S
[3]  
[Anonymous], IPCC SPEC REP EM SCE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Eos, DOI DOI 10.1029/2009EO360002
[5]  
Aveni M., 2013, RECOMMENDATIONS EXPE
[6]   Multivariate analysis of paired watershed data to evaluate agricultural best management practice effects on stream water phosphorus [J].
Bishop, PL ;
Hively, WD ;
Stedinger, JR ;
Rafferty, MR ;
Lojpersberger, JL ;
Bloomfield, JA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2005, 34 (03) :1087-1101
[7]   Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: Scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture [J].
Boesch, DF ;
Brinsfield, RB ;
Magnien, RE .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2001, 30 (02) :303-320
[8]  
Bosch DJ, 2006, T ASABE, V49, P1051, DOI 10.13031/2013.21744
[9]   OPTIMAL SPATIAL MANAGEMENT OF AGRICULTURAL POLLUTION [J].
BRADEN, JB ;
JOHNSON, GV ;
BOUZAHER, A ;
MILTZ, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1989, 71 (02) :404-413
[10]  
Bullock S., 2005, WORKSH LEARN MOD REF, P1