Validation of acoustic echo counting for studies of zooplankton behavior

被引:12
作者
De Robertis, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
acoustics; echo counting; optical verification; target strength; TS; zooplankton;
D O I
10.1006/jmsc.2000.1059
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Acoustic methods can be employed to census zooplankton in large volumes of water rapidly, but ecological interpretations of the results are often complicated by ambiguities concerning the identity of acoustic backscatters. Here, a multi-step approach is developed to evaluate the potential of acoustic echo counting for behavioral studies of zooplankton using OASIS (Optical-Acoustic Submersible Imaging System), an instrument designed for concurrent optical and acoustic imaging of zooplankton. A combination of held and laboratory analyses (1) demonstrate general agreement between echo counts and depth-stratified net sampling, (2) show that fish and zooplankton can be distinguished on the basis of target strength (TS), (3) indicate that zooplankton taxa (euphausiids and gammarid amphipods) could not be differentiated on the basis of TS, and (4) demonstrate a positive relationship between body size and TS in euphausiid crustaceans. Simulation of the system's performance suggests that at high densities of reflective targets, echo counting increasingly underestimates the true number of targets present. These results confirm that echo counting is a valuable method for behavioral studies and underscore the importance of independent verification of the identities of acoustic backscatters. (C) 2001 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 561
页数:19
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
BACKUS RICHARD H., 1957, DEEP SEA RES, V4, P116, DOI 10.1016/0146-6313(56)90041-7
[2]   SCATTERING OF UNDERWATER SOUND IN SAANICH INLET, BRITISH COLUMBIA [J].
BARY, BM ;
HERLINVEAUX, R ;
BARRACLOUGH, WE .
NATURE, 1962, 194 (4823) :36-&
[3]  
Bathmann U, 2001, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V222, P297
[4]   Estimating the spatial distribution of zooplankton biomass by combining Video Plankton Recorder and single-frequency acoustic data [J].
Benfield, MC ;
Wiebe, PH ;
Stanton, TK ;
Davis, CS ;
Gallager, SM ;
Greene, CH .
DEEP-SEA RESEARCH PART II-TOPICAL STUDIES IN OCEANOGRAPHY, 1998, 45 (07) :1175-+
[5]   COMPARISON OF ACOUSTIC AND PUMP SAMPLING TECHNIQUES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF ZOOPLANKTON DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
COSTELLO, JH ;
PIEPER, RE ;
HOLLIDAY, DV .
JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH, 1989, 11 (04) :703-709
[6]   Connectivity of marine populations: Open or closed? [J].
Cowen, RK ;
Lwiza, KMM ;
Sponaugle, S ;
Paris, CB ;
Olson, DB .
SCIENCE, 2000, 287 (5454) :857-859
[7]  
Davis C.S., 1992, ERGEBN LIMNOL, V36, P67
[8]   Size-dependent visual predation risk and the timing of vertical migration in zooplankton [J].
De Robertis, A ;
Jaffe, JS ;
Ohman, MD .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 2000, 45 (08) :1838-1844
[9]  
DEMER DA, 1998, J ACOUST SOC AM, V98, P1111
[10]   Fixed-location riverine hydroacoustics as a method of enumerating migrating adult Pacific salmon: comparison of split-beam acoustics vs. visual counting [J].
Enzenhofer, HJ ;
Olsen, N ;
Mulligan, TJ .
AQUATIC LIVING RESOURCES, 1998, 11 (02) :61-74