Decoupling the scholarly journal

被引:41
作者
Priem, Jason [1 ]
Hemminger, Bradley M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Informat & Lib Sci, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE | 2012年 / 6卷
关键词
scholarly communication; peer review; publishing; models; BIBLIOMETRICS; LIBRARIES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3389/fncom.2012.00019
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Although many observers have advocated the reform of the scholarly publishing system, improvements to functions like peer review have been adopted sluggishly. We argue that this is due to the tight coupling of the journal system: the system's essential functions of archiving, registration, dissemination, and certification are bundled together and siloed into tensc of thousands of individual journals. This tight coupling makes it difficult to change any one aspect of the system, choking out innovation. We suggest that the solution is the "decoupled journal (DcJ)." In this system, the functions are unbundled and performed as services, able to compete for patronage and evolve in response to the market. For instance, a scholar might deposit an article in her institutional repository, have it copyedited and typeset by one company, indexed for search by several others, self-marketed over her own social networks, and peer reviewed by one or more stamping agencies that connect her paper to external reviewers. The DcJ brings publishing out of its current seventeenth-century paradigm, and creates a Web-like environment of loosely joined pieces-a marketplace of tools that, like the Web, evolves quickly in response to new technologies and users' needs. Importantly, this system is able to evolve from the current one, requiring only the continued development of bolt-on services external to the journal, particularly for peer review.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs [J].
Allen, Liz ;
Jones, Ceri ;
Dolby, Kevin ;
Lynn, David ;
Walport, Mark .
PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (06)
[2]   Revolutionizing peer review? [J].
不详 .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 8 (04) :397-397
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, J COMPUT SCI-NETH, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007
[4]  
Asur S., 2010, Proceedings 2010 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence-Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), P492, DOI 10.1109/WI-IAT.2010.63
[5]  
Bogers T, 2008, RECSYS'08: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2008 ACM CONFERENCE ON RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS, P287
[6]   In a paperless world a new role for academic libraries: providing open access [J].
Bosc, H ;
Harnad, S .
LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2005, 18 (02) :95-+
[7]   Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact [J].
Brody, Tim ;
Harnad, Stevan ;
Carr, Leslie .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 57 (08) :1060-1072
[8]  
Brown J, 2010, INTRO OVERL IN PRESS
[9]   PLoS stays afloat with bulk publishing [J].
Butler, Declan .
NATURE, 2008, 454 (7200) :11-11
[10]  
Casati F., 2007, UBIQUITY, V3, DOI [10.1145/1226694.1226695, DOI 10.1145/1226694.1226695]