Evaluation of an immunoassay (EMIT) for mycophenolic acid in plasma from renal transplant recipients compared with a high-performance liquid chromatography assay

被引:70
作者
Beal, JL
Jones, CE
Taylor, PJ
Tett, SE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Pharm, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
mycophenolic acid; immunosuppressant; immunoassay; high-performance; liquid chromatography; renal transplant;
D O I
10.1097/00007691-199812000-00019
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Mycophenolic acid is an immunosuppressant administered as a bioavailable ester, mycophenolate mofetil. The pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid have been reported to be variable. Accurate measurement of concentrations of this drug could be important to adjust doses. The aim of this study was to compare the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT [Dade Behring; San Jose, CA, U.S.A.]) for mycophenolic acid with a high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay using samples collected from renal transplant recipients. The HPLC assay used solid phase extraction and a C18 stationary phase with ultraviolet (UV) detection (254 nm). The immunoassay required no manual sample preparation. Plasma samples (n = 102) from seven patients, collected at various times after a dose, were analyzed using both methods. Both assays fulfilled quality-control criteria. Higher concentrations were consistently measured in patient samples when using EMIT. The mean (+/- standard deviation [SD]) bias (EMIT-HPLC) was 1.88 +/- 0.86 mg/L. The differences in concentrations were higher in the middle of a dosage interval, suggesting that a metabolite might have been responsible for overestimation. Measurement of glucuronide concentrations by HPLC demonstrated only a weak correlation between assay differences and glucuronide concentrations. If the crossreacting substance is active, EMIT could provide a superior measure of immunosuppression; if inactive, further work is needed to improve antibody specificity. In conclusion, it was found that EMIT overestimates the concentration of mycophenolic acid in plasma samples from renal transplant recipients compared with HPLC analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 690
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Barre J, 1997, THERAPIE, V52, P139
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of mycophenolate mofetil in healthy subjects after single-dose oral and intravenous administration [J].
Bullingham, R ;
Monroe, S ;
Nicholls, A ;
Hale, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 36 (04) :315-324
[4]   Effects of food and antacid on the pharmacokinetics of single doses of mycophenolate mofetil in rheumatoid arthritis patients [J].
Bullingham, R ;
Shah, J ;
Goldblum, R ;
Schiff, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 41 (06) :513-516
[5]  
DIAS VC, 1997, THER DRUG MONIT, V19, P563
[6]  
*EHR DIAGN INC, 1997, CLIN CHEM, V43, pS209
[7]   Mycophenolate mofetil for rescue therapy in acute renal transplant rejection in children should always be monitored by measurement of trough concentration [J].
Filler, G ;
Ehrich, J .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 12 (02) :374-375
[8]  
Holt David W., 1997, Drug Metabolism and Drug Interactions, V14, P5
[9]   High-performance liquid chromatography determination of mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolite in human plasma [J].
Jones, CE ;
Taylor, PJ ;
Johnson, AG .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B, 1998, 708 (1-2) :229-234
[10]  
Keown P, 1996, TRANSPLANTATION, V61, P1029