Efficacy of screening for fetal Down syndrome in the United States from 1974 to 1997

被引:66
作者
Egan, JFX [1 ]
Benn, P
Borgida, AF
Rodis, JF
Campbell, WA
Vintzileos, AM
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Farmington, CT 06032 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Dept Pediat, Div Human Genet, Farmington, CT USA
[3] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, New Brunswick, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01044-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To estimate the 16-week prevalence of Down syndrome in the United States from 1974 to 1997 and to determine the efficacy of maternal age cutoffs and triple screens for detecting it antenatally. Methods: Using natality statistics for the United States from 1974 to 1997 of maternal-age-specific live births to women 13-49 years old, we evaluated advanced maternal age (35-49 years at delivery) and the triple serum test (maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, hCG, and unconjugated estriol) as screening tests for Down syndrome. Efficacy was evaluated using sensitivity, false-positive rate, positive predictive value, and likelihood ratio (likelihood ratio = sensitivity/false-positive rate). Results: In 1974, the estimated second-trimester prevalence of Down syndrome was one in 740, but by 1997 that had increased to one in 504. The proportion of Down syndrome fetuses at 16 weeks' gestation in women 35-49 years old increased from 28.5% in 1974 to 47.3% in 1997. However, live births to women 35-49 years old increased more rapidly from 4.7% in 1974 to 12.6% in 1997. The likelihood ratio for maternal age to identify an affected pregnancy decreased during the study period and was substantially lower than that using the serum test. Conclusion: A maternal age cutoff of 35 years in the 1990s resulted in high false-positive rates and was less efficacious based on likelihood ratio and positive predictive value. Serum testing of all pregnant women would reduce the number of amniocenteses and decrease procedure-related losses. (Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:979-85. (C) 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 985
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 1994, ACOG COMM OP, V141
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1976, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V236, P1471
[3]  
Beazoglou T, 1998, PRENATAL DIAG, V18, P1241, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199812)18:12<1241::AID-PD440>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-M
[5]  
Benn P, 1998, AM J MED GENET, V79, P121, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19980901)79:2<121::AID-AJMG8>3.3.CO
[6]  
2-I
[7]   Cost-effectiveness of estimating gestational age by ultrasonography in Down syndrome screening [J].
Benn, PA ;
Rodis, JF ;
Beazoglou, T .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 94 (01) :29-33
[8]   PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS OF DIVERSE CHROMOSOME-ABNORMALITIES IN A POPULATION OF PATIENTS IDENTIFIED BY TRIPLE-MARKER TESTING AS SCREEN POSITIVE FOR DOWN-SYNDROME [J].
BENN, PA ;
HORNE, D ;
BRIGANTI, S ;
GREENSTEIN, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 173 (02) :496-501
[9]   Maternal serum screening for fetal trisomy 18: A comparison of fixed cutoff and patient-specific risk protocols [J].
Benn, PA ;
Leo, MV ;
Rodis, JF ;
Beazoglou, T ;
Collins, R ;
Horne, D .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 93 (05) :707-711
[10]  
BRAY I, 1988, PRENAT DIAGN, V18, P9