Macroscopic background gradient and radiation damping effects on high-field PGSE NMR diffusion measurements

被引:46
作者
Price, WS [1 ]
Stilbs, P
Jönsson, B
Söderman, O
机构
[1] Royal Inst Technol, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Lund, Ctr Chem & Chem Engn, Dept Phys Chem 1, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
关键词
background gradients; bipolar gradients; calibration; diffusion; PGSE; radiation damping;
D O I
10.1006/jmre.2001.2316
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The effects of macroscopic background gradients due to susceptibility differences at the sample interfaces and of radiation damping on pulsed-gradient spin-echo (PGSE) experiments are examined. Both phenomena can lead to the seemingly strange effect of the echo signal growing as the gradient strength increases at low applied gradient strengths. For a freely diffusing species, background gradients manifest themselves as slight concave or convex inflections in the linearized PGSE attenuation curve, depending on the polarity of the applied gradient, The various means of overcoming macroscopic background gradient problems, including bipolar gradients, and their efficacy are examined experimentally and discussed. The effects of radiation damping can also result in the attenuation curve being nonlinear but, different from the effect of background gradients, the nonlinearity does not change with the polarity of the applied gradient. The vulnerability of the stimulated echo-based PGSE sequence and variations of Hahn-based PGSE sequences is investigated. Both background gradients and radiation damping have serious implications for accurate diffusion measurement determination. (C) 2001 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 56
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   STANDARD ERRORS AND CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS IN NONLINEAR-REGRESSION - COMPARISON OF MONTE-CARLO AND PARAMETRIC STATISTICS [J].
ALPER, JS ;
GELB, RI .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1990, 94 (11) :4747-4751
[2]   Demagnetizing field effects on the Hahn echo [J].
Ardelean, I ;
Kimmich, R .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 2000, 320 (1-2) :81-86
[3]  
Arfken GeorgeB., 1995, Mathematical Methods for Physicists, Fourth Edition, VFourth
[4]   ENHANCED NMR RESOLUTION BY RESTRICTING THE EFFECTIVE SAMPLE VOLUME [J].
BAX, A ;
FREEMAN, R .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1980, 37 (01) :177-181
[5]   Structural investigations with the dipolar demagnetizing field in solution NMR [J].
Bowtell, R ;
Robyr, P .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1996, 76 (26) :4971-4974
[6]   SUSCEPTIBILITY-LIMITED RESOLUTION IN NUCLEAR-MAGNETIC-RESONANCE MICROSCOPY [J].
CALLAGHAN, PT .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1990, 87 (02) :304-318
[7]  
CALLAGHAN PT, 1996, ENCY NUCL MAGNETIC R, P4665
[8]   Experimental verification of the relation between the delay time and the tipping angle for a superradiant pulse [J].
Chen, JH ;
Mao, XA .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 1999, 32 (07) :764-768
[9]   Measurement of radiation damping rate constants in nuclear magnetic resonance by inversion recovery and automated compensation of selective pulses [J].
Chen, JH ;
Cutting, B ;
Bodenhausen, G .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 112 (15) :6511-6514
[10]  
*COMSOL INC, 1998, FEMLAB