Role of dose intensity in conservative treatment of anal canal carcinoma - Report of 35 cases

被引:14
作者
Ceresoli, GL [1 ]
Ferreri, AJM [1 ]
Cordio, S [1 ]
Villa, E [1 ]
机构
[1] San Raffaele Sci Inst, Dept Radiochemotherapy, I-20132 Milan, Italy
关键词
anal carcinoma; prognostic factors; radiotherapy; chemotherapy; dose intensity;
D O I
10.1159/000011907
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered the standard treatment for anal canal cancer. However, the optimum schedule of therapy has yet to be defined. This study was carried out to evaluate the role of dose intensity (DI) of chemotherapy (ChT) and radiotherapy (RT) on the outcome of patients submitted to CRT. Thirty-five consecutive patients with anal canal carcinoma received a combination of RT (median dose 56 Gy) and ChT (two or more cycles of 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C). With a median follow-up of 33 months, 83% of patients are alive without evidence of disease and 70% are colostomy-free. Five-year actuarial disease-free survival (DFS) is 74%. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to determine the correlation of DFS with various clinical and therapeutic parameters. Our series confirmed the prognostic negative value of a tumor size >4 cm. An average relative dose-intensity (ARDI)>0.8 was related to a better outcome both in univariate and in multivariate analysis; an overall treatment time >70 days was related to a worse DFS in univariate analysis, but these data were not confirmed by the Cox model. RT dose was not associated with DFS. In conclusion, the results of this study seem to suggest an independent prognostic role of ChT DI, as measured by ARDI. The results regarding RT DI are inconclusive? and remain a matter for further trials.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 532
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] CHEMORADIOTHERAPY VERSUS RADIOTHERAPY ALONE FOR ANAL CANCER - A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARISON
    ALLAL, A
    KURTZ, JM
    PIPARD, G
    MARTI, MC
    MIRALBELL, R
    POPOWSKI, Y
    EGELI, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 27 (01): : 59 - 66
  • [2] Allal AS, 1997, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V79, P2329, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970615)79:12<2329::AID-CNCR6>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-G
  • [4] Arnott SJ, 1996, LANCET, V348, P1049
  • [5] BEAHRS OH, 1992, MANUAL STAGING CANC, P83
  • [6] BOMAN BM, 1984, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V54, P114, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19840701)54:1<114::AID-CNCR2820540124>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-P
  • [8] BYFIELD JE, 1983, CANCER TREAT REP, V67, P709
  • [9] Constantinou Eugene C., 1996, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, V36, P295, DOI 10.1016/S0360-3016(97)85613-1
  • [10] EPIDERMOID ANAL CANCER - TREATMENT BY RADIATION ALONE OR BY RADIATION AND 5-FLUOROURACIL WITH AND WITHOUT MITOMYCIN-C
    CUMMINGS, BJ
    KEANE, TJ
    OSULLIVAN, B
    WONG, CS
    CATTON, CN
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (05): : 1115 - 1125