Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach

被引:56
作者
Kessler, Oliver [2 ]
Pati, Shantanu [1 ]
Stefan, Wirth [3 ]
Mayr, Eckart [4 ]
Colwell, Clifford W., Jr. [1 ]
D'Lima, Darryl D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Scripps Clin, Shiley Ctr Orthopaed Res & Educ, Div Orthopaed Surg, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[2] Stryker Europe, Sci Affairs, Thalwil, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hosp Orthopaed Surg, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Hosp Orthopaed Surg, Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
hip arthroplasty; range of motion; computer model; impingement; hip biomechanics;
D O I
10.1002/jor.20541
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Hip range of motion after total hip arthroplasty has been shown to be dependent on prosthetic design and component placement. We hypothesized that bony anatomy would significantly affect range of motion. Computer models of a current generation hip arthroplasty design were virtually implanted in a model of pelvis and femur in various orientations ranging from 35 degrees to 55 degrees cup abduction, 0 degrees to 30 degrees cup anteversion, and 0 degrees to 30 degrees femoral anteversion. Four head sizes ranging from 22.2 to 32 mm and two neck sizes ranging from 10-mm and 12-mm diameter were tested. Range of motion was recorded as maximum flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, and axial rotation of the femur before any contact between prosthetic components or bone was detected. Bony impingement preceded component impingement in about 44% of all conditions tested, ranging from 66% in adduction to 22% in extension. Range of motion increased as head size increased. However, increasing head size also increased the propensity for bony impingement, which tended to reduce the beneficial effect of increased head size on range of motion. Reducing neck diameter had a greater effect on prosthetic impingement (mean, 3.5 degrees increase in range of motion) compared to bone impingement (mean, 1.9 degrees). This model allowed for a clinically relevant assessment of range of motion after total hip arthroplasty and may also be used with patient-specific geometry [such as that obtained from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans] for more accurate preoperative planning. (c) 2007 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 452
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]
The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint [J].
Bartz, RL ;
Noble, PC ;
Kadakia, NR ;
Tullos, HS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (09) :1300-1307
[2]
Biedermann R, 2005, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V87B, P762, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.87B6
[3]
Three-dimensional representation of complex muscle architectures and geometries [J].
Blemker, SS ;
Delp, SL .
ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 33 (05) :661-673
[4]
COOPERMAN DR, 1983, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P79
[6]
2,012 TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTIES - STUDY OF POSTOPERATIVE COURSE AND EARLY COMPLICATIONS [J].
COVENTRY, MB ;
BECKENBAUGH, RD ;
NOLAN, DR ;
ILSTRUP, DM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1974, A 56 (02) :273-284
[7]
The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios [J].
D'Lima, DD ;
Urquhart, AG ;
Buehler, KO ;
Walker, RH ;
Colwell, CW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (03) :315-321
[8]
Dorr LD, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P144
[9]
FACKLER CD, 1980, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P169
[10]
Gottschalk S., 1996, Computer Graphics Proceedings. SIGGRAPH '96, P171, DOI 10.1145/237170.237244