Cavitation bubble cluster activity in the breakage of kidney stones by lithotripter shockwaves

被引:166
作者
Pishchalnikov, YA
Sapozhnikov, OA
Bailey, MR
Williams, JC
Cleveland, RO
Colonius, T
Crum, LA
Evan, AP
McAteer, JA
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Fac Phys, Dept Acoust, Moscow, Russia
[3] Univ Washington, Appl Phys Lab, Ctr Ind & Med Ultrasound, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Boston Univ, Dept Aerosp & Mech Engn, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] CALTECH, Div Engn & Appl Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/089277903769013568
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: There is strong evidence that cavitation bubble activity contributes to stone breakage and that shockwave-bubble interactions are involved in the tissue trauma associated with shockwave lithotripsy. Cavitation control may thus be a way to improve lithotripsy. Materials and Methods: High-speed photography was used to analyze cavitation bubble activity at the surface of artificial and natural kidney stones during exposure to lithotripter shockwaves in vitro. Results: Numerous individual bubbles formed on the surfaces of stones, but these bubbles did not remain independent but rather combined to form clusters. Bubble clusters formed at the proximal and distal ends and at the sides of stones. Each cluster collapsed to a narrow point of impact. Collapse of the proximal cluster eroded the leading face of the stone, and the collapse of clusters at the sides of stones appeared to contribute to the growth of cracks. Collapse of the distal cluster caused minimal damage. Conclusion: Cavitation-mediated damage to stones is attributable, not to the action of solitary bubbles, but to the growth and collapse of bubble clusters.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 446
页数:12
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, CAVITATION POLYPHASE
[2]   Manufacturing improvement team programs in the semiconductor industry [J].
Bailey, DE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, 1997, 10 (01) :1-10
[3]  
Bailey M.R., 1999, J ACOUST SOC AM, V105, P1267
[4]   Comparison of electrohydraulic lithotripters with rigid and pressure-release ellipsoidal reflectors. II. Cavitation fields [J].
Bailey, MR ;
Blackstock, DT ;
Cleveland, RO ;
Crum, LA .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 106 (02) :1149-1160
[5]  
BAILEY MR, 1997, ARLTR971 U TEX AUST
[6]  
Brennen C.E., 1985, CAVITATION BUBBLE DY
[7]   A SCHLIEREN STUDY OF THE INTERACTION BETWEEN A LITHOTRIPTER SHOCK-WAVE AND A SIMULATED KIDNEY-STONE [J].
CARNELL, MT ;
EMMONY, DC .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1995, 21 (05) :721-724
[8]   The search for cavitation in vivo [J].
Carstensen, EL ;
Gracewski, S ;
Dalecki, D .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 26 (09) :1377-1385
[9]   Comparison between the effects of cavitation induced by two different pressure-time shock waveform pulses [J].
Cathignol, D ;
Tavakkoli, J ;
Birer, A ;
Arefiev, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 1998, 45 (03) :788-799
[10]   THE INFLUENCE OF FLUID PROPERTIES AND PULSE AMPLITUDE ON BUBBLE DYNAMICS IN THE FIELD OF A SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPTER [J].
CHOI, MJ ;
COLEMAN, AJ ;
SAUNDERS, JE .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1993, 38 (11) :1561-1573