Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation

被引:533
作者
Marsh, DM [1 ]
Trenham, PC
机构
[1] Washington & Lee Univ, Dept Biol, Lexington, VA 24450 USA
[2] US EPA, Midcontinent Ecol Div, Duluth, MN 55804 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00129.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
In many respects, amphibian spatial dynamics resemble classical metapopulation models, in which subpopulations in breeding ponds blink in and out of existence and extinction and colonization rates are functions of pond spatial arrangement. This "ponds-as-patches" view of amphibian spatial dynamics is useful in several respects. First, it highlights the importance of regional and landscape processes in determining local patterns of abundance. Second, it offers a straightforward, pond-based approach to monitoring and managing amphibian populations. For many species, however, the ponds-as-patches view may be an over-simplification and metapopulation structure may be more apparent than real. Changes in distribution may be caused by processes other than extinction and recolonization, and most extinctions probably result from deterministic factors, not stochastic processes. In addition, the effects of pond isolation appear to be important primarily in disturbed environments, and in many cases these isolation effects may be better explained by the distribution of terrestrial habitats than by the distribution of breeding ponds. These complications have important implications for both researchers and managers. For researchers, future efforts need to determine the mechanisms underlying patterns of abundance and distributional change and patterns in amphibian populations. For managers, effective conservation strategies must successfully balance metapopulation considerations with careful attention to local habitat quality. Furthermore, translocations and active management may be indispensable tools for conserving amphibians in landscapes containing multiple breeding ponds.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 49
页数:10
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Andren Claes, 1995, Memoranda Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica, V71, P82
[2]  
BEEBEE T J C, 1985, Amphibia-Reptilia, V6, P35, DOI 10.1163/156853885X00164
[3]   Factors affecting population densities of adult natterjack toads Bufo calamita in Britain [J].
Beebee, TJC ;
Denton, JS ;
Buckley, J .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1996, 33 (02) :263-268
[4]   Changes in dewpond numbers and amphibian diversity over 20 years on chalk Downland in Sussex, England [J].
Beebee, TJC .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1997, 81 (03) :215-219
[5]   POPULATION REGULATION IN THE WOOD FROG, RANA-SYLVATICA, FROM 3 DIVERSE GEOGRAPHIC LOCALITIES [J].
BERVEN, KA .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1995, 20 (03) :385-392
[6]   DISPERSAL IN THE WOOD FROG (RANA-SYLVATICA) - IMPLICATIONS FOR GENETIC POPULATION-STRUCTURE [J].
BERVEN, KA ;
GRUDZIEN, TA .
EVOLUTION, 1990, 44 (08) :2047-2056
[8]   AMPHIBIAN DECLINES - JUDGING STABILITY, PERSISTENCE, AND SUSCEPTIBILITY OF POPULATIONS TO LOCAL AND GLOBAL EXTINCTIONS [J].
BLAUSTEIN, AR ;
WAKE, DB ;
SOUSA, WP .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1994, 8 (01) :60-71
[9]  
BLOXAM QMC, 1995, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V4, P636, DOI 10.1007/BF00222519
[10]   ISOLATION OF REMAINING POPULATIONS OF THE NATIVE FROG, RANA-MUSCOSA, BY INTRODUCED FISHES IN SEQUOIA AND KINGS CANYON NATIONAL-PARKS, CALIFORNIA [J].
BRADFORD, DF ;
TABATABAI, F ;
GRABER, DM .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1993, 7 (04) :882-888