Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach

被引:129
作者
Purcell, AT [1 ]
Lamb, RJ
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Dept Architectural & Design Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Dept Architecture, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
landscape preference; ecological factors; naturalness;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00073-5
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Preference judgements were obtained for a set of scenes consisting entirely of vegetation. The scenes, however, were systematically selected on the basis of three ecological variables - type of vegetation formation, structural integrity and foliar density and a fourth variable, extent of view. Preference varied significantly as a function of these variables but within the mid to upper range of the preference scale. Vegetation as such is, therefore, important in preference, however, the range in preference judgements indicates significant differentiation within the general category identified as vegetation. Type of vegetation interacted significantly with structural integrity, foliar density and extent of view and foliar density and extent of view interacted independently of the other two variables. This pattern of interactions is interpreted in terms of [Kaplan, S., Kaplan, R., 1982. Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an uncertain world. Praeger Publishers, New York] information processing model of environmental preference. However, a number of the aspects of the results are not covered by this model and are interpreted in terms of the role of tacit learning processes. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 66
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   DEVELOPMENT OF VISUAL PREFERENCE FOR NATURAL ENVIRONMENTS [J].
BALLING, JD ;
FALK, JH .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1982, 14 (01) :5-28
[2]  
BERNALDEZ FG, 1989, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V28, P53
[3]   AN ASSESSMENT OF PREFERENCE FOR LANDSCAPES IN THE DEVELOPING-WORLD - CASE-STUDY OF WARRI, NIGERIA, AND ENVIRONS [J].
CHOKOR, BA ;
MENE, SA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1992, 34 (04) :237-256
[4]   A COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF PREFERENCE FOR URBAN NATURE [J].
HERZOG, TR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 9 (01) :27-43
[5]   THE PREDICTION OF PREFERENCE FOR UNFAMILIAR URBAN PLACES [J].
HERZOG, TR ;
KAPLAN, S ;
KAPLAN, R .
POPULATION AND ENVIRONMENT, 1982, 5 (01) :43-59
[6]   CULTURAL AND SUB-CULTURAL COMPARISONS IN PREFERENCES FOR NATURAL SETTINGS [J].
KAPLAN, R ;
HERBERT, EJ .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 1987, 14 (04) :281-293
[7]  
Kaplan R., 1995, EXPERIENCE NATURE PS, DOI 10.1037/030621
[8]   AESTHETICS, AFFECT, AND COGNITION - ENVIRONMENTAL PREFERENCE FROM AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE [J].
KAPLAN, S .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1987, 19 (01) :3-32
[9]   RATED PREFERENCE AND COMPLEXITY FOR NATURAL AND URBAN VISUAL MATERIAL [J].
KAPLAN, S ;
KAPLAN, R ;
WENDT, JS .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1972, 12 (04) :354-&
[10]  
Kaplan S., 1979, ASSESSMENT AMENITY R