Placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study evaluating the efficacy of fluticasone propionate nasal spray for the treatment of patients with hyposmia/anosmia

被引:70
作者
Blomqvist, EH [1 ]
Lundblad, L
Bergstedt, H
Stjärne, P
机构
[1] Karolinska Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Hosp, Dept Radiol, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Inst, Huddinge Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
anosmia; corticosteroids; endoscopy; hyposmia; medical treatment; olfaction; olfactory threshold test; symptom scoring;
D O I
10.1080/00016480310002140
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
摘要
Objective-To compare the effect on olfaction of topical glucocorticoid treatment versus placebo given for an extended period in addition to oral short-term glucocorticoids in patients with anosmia/hyposmia. Material and Methods-This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The criterion for inclusion in the blinded phase was an improvement of at least 2 steps in the butanol odor threshold test following open treatment for 10 days with oral and nasal corticosteroids. Forty patients were included: 20 were randomized to treatment with fluticasone propionate, 10 to placebo and 10 others as controls. The topical treatment was continued for 6 months. Results-The 3 groups showed similar improvements in their sense of smell after the initial 10-day treatment with combined oral and nasal corticosteroids. Patients who continued the local treatment maintained the same level of improvement throughout the study, whether or not they had been given nasal corticosteroids or placebo. We found no significant differences between the treatment groups. Conclusions-In patients with anosmia/hyposmia partly caused by local inflammation, no further improvement in the olfactory threshold is achieved by continuing with a topical intranasal glucocorticoid after an initial combined topical and systemic glucocorticoid treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:862 / 868
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
A randomized controlled study evaluating medical treatment versus surgical treatment in addition to medical treatment of nasal polyposis [J].
Blomqvist, EH ;
Lundblad, L ;
Änggård, A ;
Haraldsson, PO ;
Stjäme, P .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 107 (02) :224-228
[2]
CAIN WS, 1988, LARYNGOSCOPE, V98, P83
[3]
Olfaction and its alteration by nasal obstruction, rhinitis, and rhinosinusitis [J].
Doty, RL ;
Mishra, A .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2001, 111 (03) :409-423
[4]
GOODSPEED RB, 1986, CLIN MEASUREMENT TAS, P514
[5]
Olfactory threshold after nasal allergen challenge [J].
Hinriksdottir, I ;
Murphy, C ;
Bende, M .
ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY AND ITS RELATED SPECIALTIES, 1997, 59 (01) :36-38
[6]
Holmstronm Mats, 1997, Rhinology (Utrecht), V35, P108
[7]
JAFEK BW, 1987, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V113, P547
[8]
Olfactory dysfunction in allergic rhinitis is related to nasal eosinophilic inflammation [J].
Klimek, L ;
Eggers, G .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1997, 100 (02) :158-164
[9]
Klimek L, 1998, Pneumologie, V52, P196
[10]
Distortion of olfactory perception: Diagnosis and treatment [J].
Leopold, D .
CHEMICAL SENSES, 2002, 27 (07) :611-615