Overseas innovations by Japanese firms: an analysis of patent and subsidiary data

被引:83
作者
Belderbos, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Fac Econ & Business Adm, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
innovation; R&D; multinational enterprise; patents; Japan;
D O I
10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00120-1
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper examines patent and overseas subsidiary data of 231 large and medium-sized Japanese electronics firms to analyse the characteristics and determinants of foreign research and development (R&D) activities. A number of medium-sized firms have highly internationalised R&D operations, whereas most large Japanese electronics firms remain strongly dependent on domestic R&D. Statistical analysis of the firm-level determinants of the number of overseas innovations established positive and significant effects of R&D intensity, export intensity, overseas manufacturing intensity, operating experience in greenfield manufacturing subsidiaries overseas, and the relative importance of acquisitions in overseas manufacturing, while a nonlinear relationship between firm size and overseas innovations was found. The results support the notions of a technology exploitation motive for overseas R&D as well as a substantial additional role for a technology sourcing motive. Support is also found for the hypothesis that part of the explanation for the low degree of R&D internationalisation of Japanese firms must be sought in their relatively late and rapid overseas expansion since the mid-1980s. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 332
页数:20
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], JAPANESE FIRM SOURCE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, GLOBAL RES STRATEGY
[3]  
[Anonymous], REV EC STAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, INT RES DEV MULTINAT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, JAPANESE ELECT MULTI
[6]  
ARCHIBUGI D, 1995, CAMBRIDGE J ECON, V19, P121
[7]  
Bartlett C. A., 1991, MANAGING GLOBAL FIRM
[8]  
BELDERB RA, IN PRESS ROLE FOREIG
[9]  
BELDERBOS RA, 1999, RM9905 NIBOR FAC EC
[10]  
CANTWELL J, 1995, CAMBRIDGE J ECON, V19, P155