Winter habitat selection by two sympatric forest grouse in western Switzerland: implications for conservation

被引:59
作者
Sachot, S [1 ]
Perrin, N [1 ]
Neet, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Conservat Frune & Nature, CH-1025 St Sulpice, Switzerland
关键词
capercaillie; hazel grouse; forest management; Switzerland; winter habitat selection;
D O I
10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00334-8
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Two endangered tetraonids, the capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and the hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia rupestris), are sympatric throughout part of their distribution range in central Europe. Precise information on their specific habitat requirements is needed if the coexistence of both species in exploited forests is to be maintained. We quantified winter habitat selection for both species in the upper part (1100-1600 m) of the Jura mountains (Switzerland). No preference for altitude or exposure could be detected. Capercaillie preferred open forests (including grazed forests) with a sparse canopy dominated by spruce (Picea abies) and fir (Abies alba), and avoided dense undercanopy and understorey, especially when dominated by spruce and beech (Fagus sylvatica). By contrast, hazel grouse preferred feeding sites with a dense understorey of rowan (Sorbus aucuparia), willow (Salix sp.), beech and spruce. These preferences can be related to the feeding habits and predator avoidance behaviour of both species. Coexistence thus requires a mosaic distribution of habitat types, with a matrix of open forests (30% canopy cover) where fir is favoured, and understorey kept sparse (20%). Group-cuts of mature trees should allow regeneration patches, where a dense understorey (50% cover) should provide suitable habitats for hazel grouse. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 382
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   THE EFFECT OF MATRIX ON THE OCCURRENCE OF HAZEL GROUSE (BONASA-BONASIA) IN ISOLATED HABITAT FRAGMENTS [J].
ABERG, J ;
JANSSON, G ;
SWENSON, JE ;
ANGELSTAM, P .
OECOLOGIA, 1995, 103 (03) :265-269
[3]  
BERNARDLAURENT A, 1994, GIBIER FAUNE SAUVAGE, V11, P5
[4]  
BIGGY CJ, 1997, BIRD CENSUS TECHNIQU
[5]  
Blattner Martin, 1998, Ornithologische Beobachter, V95, P11
[6]   AIMS AND METHODS OF MANAGING FORESTS FOR THE CONSERVATION OF TETRAONIDS [J].
BOAG, DA ;
ROLSTAD, J .
ORNIS SCANDINAVICA, 1991, 22 (03) :225-226
[7]  
BRASSEL P, 1999, INVENTAIRE FORESTIER
[8]  
Brenot Jean-Francois, 1996, Alauda, V64, P249
[9]  
CATUSSE M, 1992, B MENSUEL OFFICE NAT, V173, P14
[10]  
Cramp S, 1977, P1