HAM-D17 and HAM-D6 Sensitivity to Change in Relation to Desvenlafaxine Dose and Baseline Depression Severity in Major Depressive Disorder

被引:28
作者
Beth, P. [1 ]
Boyer, P. [2 ]
Germain, J. M. [3 ]
Padmanabhan, K. [4 ]
Haudiquet, V. [3 ]
Pitrosky, B. [3 ]
Tourian, K. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Frederiksborg Cent Cty Hosp, Psychiat Res Unit, DK-3400 Hillerod, Denmark
[2] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[3] Pfizer, Paris, France
[4] Pfizer, Collegeville, PA USA
关键词
SHORT-TERM TREATMENT; HAMILTON DEPRESSION; DOUBLE-BLIND; CONTROLLED-TRIALS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; 100; MG/DAY; PLACEBO; METAANALYSIS; EFFICACY; ANTIDEPRESSANTS;
D O I
10.1055/s-0030-1263173
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Introduction This retrospective analysis compared sensitivity to change on the 17-item and 6-item Hamilton rating scales for depression (HAM-D-17 and HAM-D-6, respectively) in relation to antidepressant dose and baseline depression severity Methods Data were derived from 6 randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trials of fixed-dose desvenlafaxine (50, 100 200 or 400 mg/d) for major depressive disorder HAM-D-17 and HAM-D-6 effect sizes were assessed Results HAM-D-17 effect sizes were negative (favoured placebo) for higher desvenlafaxine doses (200-400 mg/d) at week 1 but were positive for all doses after week 2, with no clear dose-response pattern However, HAM-D-6 effect sizes were positive for all doses at all weeks Effect sizes were consistently greater for HAM-D-6 vs HAM-D-17, regardless of time spent under therapy Effect sizes were greater for HAM-D-6 vs HAM-D-17 for all desvenlafaxine doses among patients with baseline HAM-D-17 <25 but not among patients with baseline HAM-D-17 >= 25 Discussion The HAM-D-6 demonstrated greater sensitivity to change and robustness than the HAM-D-17, supporting the greater homogeneity of the HAM-D-6
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 276
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   CONSENSUS CONFERENCE ON THE METHODOLOGY OF CLINICAL-TRIALS OF ANTIDEPRESSANTS, ZURICH, MARCH 1988 - REPORT OF THE CONSENSUS COMMITTEE [J].
ANGST, J ;
BECH, P ;
BOYER, P ;
BRUINVELS, J ;
ENGEL, R ;
HELMCHEN, H ;
HIPPIUS, H ;
LINGJAERDE, O ;
RACAGNI, G ;
SALETU, B ;
SEDVALL, G ;
SILVERSTONE, JT ;
STEFANIS, CN ;
STOLL, K ;
WOGGON, B .
PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 1989, 22 (01) :3-7
[2]  
Bech P, 2001, INT J NEUROPSYCHOPH, V4, P337, DOI 10.1017/S1461145701002565
[3]   Escitalopram dose-response revisited: an alternative psychometric approach to evaluate clinical effects of escitalopram compared to citalopram and placebo in patients with major depression [J].
Bech, P ;
Tanghoj, P ;
Cialdella, P ;
Andersen, HF ;
Pedersen, AG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 7 (03) :283-290
[4]   Is the antidepressive effect of second-generation antidepressants a myth? [J].
Bech, P. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2010, 40 (02) :181-186
[5]   Applied psychometrics in clinical psychiatry: the pharmacopsychometric triangle [J].
Bech, P. .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2009, 120 (05) :400-409
[6]   Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of fluoxetine v. placebo and tricyclic antidepressants in the short-term treatment of major depression [J].
Bech, P ;
Cialdella, P ;
Haugh, MC ;
Birkett, MA ;
Hours, A ;
Boissel, JP ;
Tollefson, GD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 176 :421-428
[7]   QUANTITATIVE RATING OF DEPRESSIVE STATES [J].
BECH, P ;
GRAM, LF ;
DEIN, E ;
JACOBSEN, O ;
VITGER, J ;
BOLWIG, TG .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1975, 51 (03) :161-170
[8]   THE HAMILTON DEPRESSION SCALE - EVALUATION OF OBJECTIVITY USING LOGISTIC-MODELS [J].
BECH, P ;
ALLERUP, P ;
GRAM, LF ;
REISBY, N ;
ROSENBERG, R ;
JACOBSEN, O ;
NAGY, A .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1981, 63 (03) :290-299
[9]   Dose-response relationship of duloxetine in placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients with major depressive disorder [J].
Bech, Per ;
Kajdasz, Daniel K. ;
Porsdal, Vibeke .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 188 (03) :273-280
[10]   Effectiveness of antidepressants - Meta-analysis of dose-effect relationships in randomised clinical trials [J].
Bollini, P ;
Pampallona, S ;
Tibaldi, G ;
Kupelnick, B ;
Munizza, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 174 :297-303