Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt

被引:657
作者
Atkins, Salla [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lewin, Simon [1 ,4 ]
Smith, Helen [5 ]
Engel, Mark [6 ]
Fretheim, Atle [7 ]
Volmink, Jimmy [2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] MRC, Hlth Syst Res Unit, Cape Town, South Africa
[2] MRC, S African Cochrane Ctr, Cape Town, South Africa
[3] Univ Cape Town, Primary Hlth Care Directorate, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
[4] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Publ Hlth & Policy, London WC1, England
[5] Univ Liverpool Liverpool Sch Trop Med, Int Hlth Grp, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[6] Univ Cape Town, Dept Med, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
[7] Norwegian Knowledge Ctr, Hlth Serv, Oslo, Norway
[8] Univ Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2288-8-21
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Qualitative synthesis has become more commonplace in recent years. Meta-ethnography is one of several methods for synthesising qualitative research and is being used increasingly within health care research. However, many aspects of the steps in the process remain ill-defined. Discussion: We utilized the seven stages of the synthesis process to synthesise qualitative research on adherence to tuberculosis treatment. In this paper we discuss the methodological and practical challenges faced; of particular note are the methods used in our synthesis, the additional steps that we found useful in clarifying the process, and the key methodological challenges encountered in implementing the meta-ethnographic approach. The challenges included shaping an appropriate question for the synthesis; identifying relevant studies; assessing the quality of the studies; and synthesising findings across a very large number of primary studies from different contexts and research traditions. We offer suggestions that may assist in undertaking meta-ethnographies in the future. Summary: Meta-ethnography is a useful method for synthesising qualitative research and for developing models that interpret findings across multiple studies. Despite its growing use in health research, further research is needed to address the wide range of methodological and epistemological questions raised by the approach.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Anfara V.A., 2002, EDUC RESEARCHER, V31, P28, DOI DOI 10.3102/0013189X031007028
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, QUALITATIVE EVIDENCE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2004, INTEGRATIVE APPROACH
  • [4] Evaluating and synthesizing qualitative research: the need to develop a distinctive approach
    Barbour, RS
    Barbour, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2003, 9 (02) : 179 - 186
  • [5] Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?
    Barbour, RS
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7294): : 1115 - 1117
  • [6] The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies
    Barroso, J
    Gollop, CJ
    Sandelowski, M
    Meynell, J
    Pearce, PF
    Collins, LJ
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2003, 25 (02) : 153 - 178
  • [7] RESEARCHING PUBLIC-HEALTH - BEHIND THE QUALITATIVE QUANTITATIVE METHODOLOGICAL DEBATE
    BAUM, F
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1995, 40 (04) : 459 - 468
  • [8] Britten Nicky, 2002, J Health Serv Res Policy, V7, P209, DOI 10.1258/135581902320432732
  • [9] Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care
    Campbell, R
    Pound, P
    Pope, C
    Britten, N
    Pill, R
    Morgan, M
    Donovan, J
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 56 (04) : 671 - 684
  • [10] The problem of appraising qualitative research
    Dixon-Woods, M
    Shaw, RL
    Agarwal, S
    Smith, JA
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 13 (03): : 223 - 225