Long-term outcome and prognostic factors in patients with cervical carcinoma: a retrospective study

被引:79
作者
Atahan, I. L.
Onal, C. [1 ]
Ozyar, E.
Yiliz, F.
Selek, U.
Kose, F.
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Matern Hosp, Social Insurance Inst, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
brachytherapy; cervical cancer; chemoradiotherapy; prognostic factors; radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00895.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study evaluates treatment outcomes and possible prognostic factors of inoperable cervical cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR BRT). Between 1993 and 2000, 183 patients with cervical cancer were treated at our institute. Radiotherapy was the sole treatment modality until January 1997; after the announcement of National Cancer Institute in 1999, 40 mg/m(2) of cisplatin (49%) was routinely applied every week. Median age was 54 years (32-92 years). Most patients (88%) had advanced-stage disease (IIB-IIIB). With a median follow-up time of 45 months (6-121 months), the 5-year overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival (DFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 55%, 71%, 51%, and 77%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that age, tumor size, lymph node status, and concomitant cisplatin were prognostic factors for OS. The DFS rates were lower in young age group. Patients with tumor greater than 4 cm and age greater than 40 were at greater risk for local recurrence. Distant metastases were more frequent in patients with adenocarcinoma. Concurrent cisplatin use increases DMFS rates (91% vs 78%; P = 0.05). In multivariate analysis, extensive stage, parametrial infiltration, young age, adenocarcinoma histopathology, and lymph node metastasis were negative prognostic factors for OS while concomitant cisplatin increases OS. Likewise, patients with extensive stage, adenocarcinoma, and without concurrent cisplatin administration had more risk for distant metastasis. There was no treatment-related mortality. Grade 3-4 morbidity rates were seen only in eight patients (4%). The combination of EBRT and HDR BRT together with concomitant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced carcinoma of cervix is safe and well tolerated with acceptable morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 842
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] RATIONALE FOR USING PATHOLOGICAL TUMOR DIMENSIONS AND NODAL STATUS TO SUBCLASSIFY SURGICALLY TREATED STAGE-IB CERVICAL-CANCER PATIENTS
    ALVAREZ, RD
    POTTER, ME
    SOONG, SJ
    GAY, FL
    HATCH, KD
    PARTRIDGE, EE
    SHINGLETON, HM
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1991, 43 (02) : 108 - 112
  • [2] RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR INVASIVE CERVICAL-CANCER - A 25-YEAR PROSPECTIVE EXPERIENCE WITH THE MIAMI TECHNIQUE
    AVERETTE, HE
    NGUYEN, HN
    DONATO, DM
    PENALVER, MA
    SEVIN, BU
    ESTAPE, R
    LITTLE, WA
    [J]. CANCER, 1993, 71 (04) : 1422 - 1437
  • [3] Prognostic factors in adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix
    Baalbergen, A
    Ewing-Graham, PC
    Hop, WCJ
    Struijk, P
    Helmerhorst, TJM
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 92 (01) : 262 - 267
  • [4] Carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix treated with radiotherapy alone: A French cooperative study: Update and multivariate analysis of prognostics factors
    Barillot, I
    Horiot, JC
    Pigneux, J
    Schraub, S
    Pourquier, H
    Daly, N
    Bolla, M
    Rozan, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 38 (05): : 969 - 978
  • [5] SURVIVAL AND PATTERNS OF RECURRENCE IN CERVICAL-CANCER METASTATIC TO PERIAORTIC LYMPH-NODES - (A GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP-STUDY)
    BERMAN, ML
    KEYS, H
    CREASMAN, W
    DISAIA, P
    BUNDY, B
    BLESSING, J
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1984, 19 (01) : 8 - 16
  • [6] BERMAN ML, 1977, OBSTET GYNECOL, V50, P658
  • [7] CHILDERS JM, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P741
  • [8] COIA L, 1990, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V66, P2451, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19901215)66:12<2451::AID-CNCR2820661202>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-5
  • [10] COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187