The higher-order structure of common DSM mental disorders: internalization, externalization, and their connections to personality

被引:297
作者
Krueger, RF [1 ]
McGue, M [1 ]
Iacono, WG [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
personality traits; mental disorders; DSM; internalizing disorders; externalizing disorders; comorbidity;
D O I
10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00106-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Comorbidity among mental disorders is commonly observed in clinical and epidemiological samples. Can comorbidity be understood as meaningful covariance, and is this covariance structure linked with personality? We addressed this question in a sample of 634 female and 549 male, middle-aged participants in the Minnesota Twin-Family Study (MTFS). Mental disorders were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R, the Substance Abuse Module from the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, and a specially-designed interview for the assessment of antisocial personality disorder. Personality was assessed using the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Relations among symptom scales for eight common DSM disorders were compatible with hypothesized underlying bivariate normal distributions. Polychoric correlations among these scales were well-fit by a two-factor model positing internalizing and externalizing factors, which, in turn, were correlated with broad personality dimensions. Internalizing was positively correlated with negative emotionality (and negatively with positive emotionality in women) and externalizing was negatively correlated with constraint. These findings suggest that internalization, externalization, and their links to personality may provide a useful framework for understanding covariance among common adult mental disorders. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1245 / 1259
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
ACHENBACH TM, 1984, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V35, P227, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.001303
[2]   CLASSIFICATION OF CHILD PSYCHOPATHOLOGY - REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICAL EFFORTS [J].
ACHENBACH, TM ;
EDELBROCK, CS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1978, 85 (06) :1275-1301
[3]   Empirically based assessment and taxonomy: Applications to clinical research [J].
Achenbach, TM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :261-274
[4]   FACTOR-ANALYSIS AND AIC [J].
AKAIKE, H .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1987, 52 (03) :317-332
[5]  
AKISKAL HS, 1983, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V40, P801
[6]  
American Psychiatric Association American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, V5, P947, DOI [DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.744053, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596.744053]
[7]  
[Anonymous], PERSONALITY PSYCHOPA, DOI DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/7NK9T
[8]   GENES, ENVIRONMENT, AND PERSONALITY [J].
BOUCHARD, TJ .
SCIENCE, 1994, 264 (5166) :1700-1701
[9]   The efficacy of 2 different dosages of methylphenidate in treating adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [J].
Bouffard, R ;
Hechtman, L ;
Minde, K ;
Iaboni-Kassab, F .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2003, 48 (08) :546-554
[10]   EXPLORATORY AND CONFIRMATORY TESTS OF THE BIG 5 AND TELLEGENS 3-DIMENSIONAL AND 4-DIMENSIONAL MODELS [J].
CHURCH, AT ;
BURKE, PJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 66 (01) :93-114