The social construction of an imperative - Why welfare reform happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but not in Germany

被引:208
作者
Cox, RH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1353/wp.2001.0008
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
This article seeks to explain why Denmark and the Netherlands made dramatic progress reforming their welfare systems in the 1990s and why Germany had a relatively slow start. Some possible explanations found to be incomplete are institutional differences in welfare programs, the uniqueness of circumstances (for example, German unification), and the balance of political power in governing institutions. An important part of the puzzle is an increasing perception of the need to reform that was more widespread in Denmark and the Netherlands. The social construction of an imperative to reform in these countries generated a political consensus that was elusive in Germany but that may be developing under Gerhard Schroder's government.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / +
页数:37
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] ABRAHAMSON P, 1994, WELFARE SOC TRANSITI
  • [2] ABRAHAMSON P, 1995, JB ARBEIT TECHNIK 19
  • [3] ACKERMANN CH, 1994, SPAARREGELINGEN
  • [4] ALBER J, 1998, LEVIATHAN Z SOZIALWI, V26
  • [5] ALBER J, 1988, POLIT SOC, V16, P447
  • [6] Andersen B. R., 1984, DAEDALUS, V113
  • [7] ANDERSEN JG, 1999, END WELFARE STATE RE, P19
  • [8] ANDERSEN JG, 1991, SKATTER UDEN VELFOER, P316
  • [9] ANDERSEN JG, 1993, WELFARE TRENDS SCAND
  • [10] [Anonymous], INT ORG