Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition

被引:883
作者
Feldman, MP
Audretsch, DB [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Inst Dev Strategies, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Policy Studies Inst, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[3] Ctr Econ Policy Res, London SW1Y 6LA, England
关键词
innovation; geography; economic development; agglomeration; spillovers;
D O I
10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Whether diversity or specialization of economic activity better promotes technological change and subsequent economic growth has been the subject of a heated debate in the economics literature. The purpose of this paper is to consider the effect of the composition of economic activity on innovation. We test whether the specialization of economic activity within a narrow concentrated set of economic activities is more conducive to knowledge spillovers or if diversity, by bringing together complementary activities, better promotes innovation. The evidence provides considerable support for the diversity thesis but little support for the specialization thesis. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. JEL classification. O3, O1.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 429
页数:21
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1990, COMP ADVANTAGE NATIO
  • [2] Arrows K.J, 1962, Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400879762-024
  • [3] Audretsch DB, 1996, AM ECON REV, V86, P630
  • [4] Audretsch DB, 1996, AM ECON REV, V86, P641
  • [5] Audretsch DB., 1995, INNOVATION IND EVOLU
  • [6] COHEN W, 1990, ADM SCI Q, V35, P1288
  • [7] COHEN WM, 1995, UNPUB IS TENDENCY VA
  • [8] Feldman M., 1994, GEOGRAPHY INNOVATION
  • [9] THE GEOGRAPHIC SOURCES OF INNOVATION - TECHNOLOGICAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND PRODUCT INNOVATION IN THE UNITED-STATES
    FELDMAN, MP
    FLORIDA, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 1994, 84 (02) : 210 - 229
  • [10] GROWTH IN CITIES
    GLAESER, EL
    KALLAL, HD
    SCHEINKMAN, JA
    SHLEIFER, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1992, 100 (06) : 1126 - 1152