Measuring ego-centered social networks on the web: Questionnaire design issues

被引:56
作者
Vehovar, Vasja [1 ]
Manfreda, Katja Lozar [1 ]
Koren, Gasper [1 ]
Hlebec, Valentina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Social Sci, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
关键词
web survey; questionnaire design; ego-centered networks; social support; data collection; data quality;
D O I
10.1016/j.socnet.2008.03.002
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Collecting survey data on ego-centered social networks is a difficult task, owing to the complex questionnaire format. Usually, the interviewer handles the dynamics of the question-answer exchange, motivates the respondent and ensures the proper recording of the data. Self-administered modes of data collection, especially web data collection, are more problematic, as the respondents are left alone with a complex and burdensome questionnaire. Therefore, questionnaire layout is crucial for ensuring cooperation and data quality. In this paper we examined three key components of the corresponding web questionnaire: the number of name boxes using a single name generator, question format for assessing alter characteristics (i.e. alter-wise vs. question-wise) and number of name interpreters (i.e. alter characteristics). The number of name boxes was found to be essential for the reported size of social networks and also for some aspects of data quality. Specific data quality effects were also found with respect to variations in question format, where question-wise format performed better than alter-wise. The number of name interpreters had a relatively minor effect. Suggestions for possible standardization of the web interface layout are also given, so that equivalence with other data collection modes can be established. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 222
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
*AAPOR, 2005, BEST PRACT SURV PUBL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, CONNECTIONS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Survey nonresponse
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, METHODOLOGY-EUR, DOI DOI 10.1027/1614-2241.2.1.7
[5]  
[Anonymous], GUID COND MARK OP RE
[6]   Interpretation and interview context: examining the General Social Survey name generator using cognitive methods [J].
Bailey, S ;
Marsden, PV .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1999, 21 (03) :287-309
[7]  
BALTER O, 2005, ESF SCSS EXPL WORKSH
[8]   COMPARING 4 DIFFERENT METHODS FOR MEASURING PERSONAL SOCIAL NETWORKS [J].
BERNARD, HR ;
JOHNSEN, EC ;
KILLWORTH, PD ;
MCCARTY, C ;
SHELLEY, GA ;
ROBINSON, S .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1990, 12 (03) :179-215
[9]   HOW MUCH OF A NETWORK DOES THE GSS AND RSW DREDGE UP [J].
BERNARD, HR ;
SHELLEY, GA ;
KILLWORTH, P .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1987, 9 (01) :49-61
[10]   USING EGOCENTERED NETWORKS IN SURVEY-RESEARCH - A METHODOLOGICAL PREVIEW ON AN APPLICATION OF SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS IN THE AREA OF FAMILY RESEARCH [J].
BIEN, W ;
MARBACH, J ;
NEYER, F .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1991, 13 (01) :75-90