Portohepatic gradient and portal hemodynamics in patients with cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus infection

被引:26
作者
Deplano, A
Migaleddu, V
Pischedda, A
Garrucciu, G
Gregu, G
Multinu, C
Piredda, M
Tocco, A
Urigo, F
Cossu, PA
Solinas, A
机构
[1] Univ Sassari, Inst Patol Med, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
[2] Univ Sassari, Ist Radiol, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
[3] Univ Sassari, Ist Clin Med, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
关键词
portal hypertension; hepatitis C virus; cirrhosis; wedged hepatic vein pressure; portal vein pressure; portal hemodynamics;
D O I
10.1023/A:1026622721389
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
We evaluated the agreement between wedged hepatic vein pressure (WHVP), portal vein pressure (PVP), and its relationship with portal hemodynamics in 21 patients with HCV-related cirrhosis with esophageal varices. Direct measurements of the portohepatic gradient (HVPG) were obtained by ultrasound-guided fine needle puncture of the right hepatic and the portal veins. In five cases PVP was 6.4-10.4 mm Hg higher than WHVP. In 12 cases measurements were similar (WHVP - PVP less than or equal to 3 mm Hg). In the remaining four cases WHVP was 3.6-9.6 mm Hg higher than PVP. WHVP and PVP agreement was not related to HVPG mean value, Child-Pugh score, or grading of esophageal varices. By contrast, the difference between WHVP and PVP was inversely related to the portal flow velocity (P = 0.053) and directly related to the portal vascular resistance (P = 0.02). Whereas the portal branches were visualized in patients with WHVP lower or similar to PVP, a predominant left portosystemic collateral flow was observed in patients with WHVP > PVP. Our data point out that, in patients with cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus infection, discrepant HVPG values reflect true hemodynamic differences.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 162
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Hepatic venous pressure measurement: An old test as a new prognostic marker in cirrhosis? [J].
Armonis, A ;
Patch, D ;
Burroughs, A .
HEPATOLOGY, 1997, 25 (01) :245-248
[2]  
BAURET P, 1989, GASTROEN CLIN BIOL, V13, P132
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]  
BOYER TD, 1977, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V72, P584
[5]   MEASUREMENT OF NORMAL PORTAL VENOUS-BLOOD FLOW BY DOPPLER ULTRASOUND [J].
BROWN, HS ;
HALLIWELL, M ;
QAMAR, M ;
READ, AE ;
EVANS, JM ;
WELLS, PNT .
GUT, 1989, 30 (04) :503-509
[6]  
CICCHETTI DV, 1981, AM J MENT DEF, V86, P127
[7]  
COSENTINO F, 1994, P CONS C NEW IT END, P23
[8]   RELATION BETWEEN PORTAL PRESSURE RESPONSE TO PHARMACOTHERAPY AND RISK OF RECURRENT VARICEAL HEMORRHAGE IN PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS [J].
FEU, F ;
GARCIAPAGAN, JC ;
BOSCH, J ;
LUCA, A ;
TERES, J ;
ESCORSELL, A ;
RODES, J .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982) :1056-1059
[9]   PORTAL PRESSURE, PRESENCE OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL VARICES AND VARICEAL BLEEDING [J].
GARCIATSAO, G ;
GROSZMANN, RJ ;
FISHER, RL ;
CONN, HO ;
ATTERBURY, CE ;
GLICKMAN, M .
HEPATOLOGY, 1985, 5 (03) :419-424
[10]  
GILMORE GT, 1990, J HEPATOL, V20, P5