Genetics providers and the family covenant: Connecting individuals with their families

被引:14
作者
Doukas, DJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Family Practice & Community Med, Ctr Bioeth, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
GENETIC TESTING | 2003年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1089/109065703322783671
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
As genetic testing becomes more commonplace, medicine will likely face both family and individual demands for access to, and control of, test result information. Past research has emphasized confidentiality concerns of the individual and contrasted these claims with the "need to know" by others to avoid harm. These confidentiality concerns, based on individual self-interest, are challenged by a singularly important aspect of genetic testing-familial responsibility. As patients are often motivated to obtain genetic testing by an array of "other-directed" considerations toward their own family (such as love, fiduciary responsibility, gratitude, etc.), an accounting of these concerns is warranted. Understanding the relevance of family relationships and obligations facilitates a fuller informed consent for genetic testing. Genetic counselors and geneticists engaging in genetic counseling can account for the concerns of both individuals and their families using the family covenant-a helpful, innovative model to address proactively boundaries of privacy and information sharing within the family. This model focuses on two areas of discussion: (1) the demarcation of the boundaries of confidentiality; and (2) the definition of "family." The family covenant helps genetics providers consider what information "should" be confidential, and with respect to whom.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 321
页数:7
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
ANDREWS LB, 1997, GENETIC SECRETS PROT
[2]   Hereditary cancer risk notification and testing: How interested is the general population? [J].
Andrykowski, MA ;
Lightner, R ;
Studts, JL ;
Munn, RK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (05) :2139-2148
[3]  
[Anonymous], J HLTH CARE LAW POLI
[4]  
Ashcroft Richard, 2001, American Journal of Bioethics, V1, P22, DOI 10.1162/152651601750417865
[5]   Stress and genetic testing for disease risk [J].
Baum, A ;
Friedman, AL ;
Zakowski, SG .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 16 (01) :8-19
[6]  
BECKER MH, 1974, HLTH ED MONOGRAPH, V2
[7]   Future directions in genetic counseling: Practical and ethical considerations [J].
Biesecker, BB .
KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF ETHICS JOURNAL, 1998, 8 (02) :145-160
[8]  
Biesecker BB, 1997, GENETIC SECRETS PROT, P108
[9]   Genetic knowledge and third-party interests [J].
Boetzkes, E .
CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 1999, 8 (03) :386-392
[10]   Likelihood of undergoing genetic testing for cancer risk: A population-based study [J].
Bosompra, K ;
Flynn, BS ;
Ashikaga, T ;
Rairikar, CJ ;
Worden, JK ;
Solomon, LJ .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 30 (02) :155-166