Timing of maturity in ultra-narrow and conventional row cotton as affected by nitrogen fertilizer rate

被引:38
作者
Clawson, Ernest L. [1 ]
Cothren, J. Tom [2 ]
Blouin, David C. [3 ]
Satterwhite, Jason L.
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Ctr Agr, St Joseph, LA 71366 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Expt Stat, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2007.0131
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Ultra-narrow row (UNR) systems and N fertilizer can influence cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) crop maturation. Study objectives were to measure impacts of UNR systems and N fertilizer rates on cotton maturation and to identify mechanisms by which these effects occurred. The location was Burleson County, Texas. In the split plot design, whole plots were N rates of 0, 50, 101, and 151 kg ha(-1). Split plots were 19-, 38-(both UNR), and 76-cm (conventional row, CR) row spacings with 296,600, 195,400, and 136,300 plants ha-1, respectively. Thirty, 60, and 85% harvestable seedcotton each occurred 1.5 to 2.9 d earlier in UNR than CR spacings. First boll set occurred I d later in 19-cm than in wider row spacings. Boll set rate m(-2) was greater in 19- than 76-cm row spacing during a 5-d flowering period shortly after first boll set, but did not differ by row spacing during three flowering periods thereafter. The percentage first position bolls was lower with wider row spacing, suggesting greater potential for concurrent boll set at multiple sites on individual plants. Eventual development of nonfirst position fruiting sites in 76-cm row spacing may have contributed to confinement of faster boll set in 19-cm row spacing to early bloom. Nitrogen rates did not affect the timing of 305 60, or 85% harvest. Reductions in bolls plant(-1) were counteracted by slower boll set rates with lower N. The limited observed interactions of N and row spacing do not suggest advantages from suboptimal N rates in UNR cotton.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 431
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   RESPONSE OF COTTON TO ROW PATTERNS AND PLANT POPULATIONS [J].
BAKER, SH .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1976, 68 (01) :85-88
[2]   Analysis of cotton yield stability across population densities [J].
Bednarz, CW ;
Bridges, DC ;
Brown, SM .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2000, 92 (01) :128-135
[3]   Phenological and morphological components of cotton crop maturity [J].
Bednarz, CW ;
Nichols, RL .
CROP SCIENCE, 2005, 45 (04) :1497-1503
[4]   NITROGEN AND MEPIQUAT CHLORIDE EFFECTS ON THE PRODUCTION OF NONRANK, IRRIGATED, SHORT-SEASON COTTON [J].
BOMAN, RK ;
WESTERMAN, RL .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1994, 7 (01) :70-75
[5]   Long-term tillage, cover crop, and nitrogen rate effects on cotton: Plant growth and yield components [J].
Boquet, DJ ;
Hutchinson, RL ;
Breitenbeck, GA .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2004, 96 (05) :1443-1452
[6]   NITROGEN EFFECTS ON BOLL PRODUCTION OF FIELD-GROWN COTTON [J].
BOQUET, DJ ;
MOSER, EB ;
BREITENBECK, GA .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1993, 85 (01) :34-39
[7]  
Bourland F. M., 2001, Journal of Cotton Science, V5, P1
[8]   FRUITING PATTERN IN NARROW-ROW COTTON [J].
BUXTON, DR ;
PATTERSON, LL ;
BRIGGS, RE .
CROP SCIENCE, 1979, 19 (01) :17-22
[9]   Nitrogen fertilization and yield of cotton in ultra-narrow and conventional row spacings [J].
Clawson, EL ;
Cothren, JT ;
Blouin, DC .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2006, 98 (01) :72-79
[10]   COTTON YIELD AND NITROGEN REQUIREMENT IS MODIFIED BY CROP-ROTATION AND TILLAGE METHOD [J].
CONSTABLE, GA ;
ROCHESTER, IJ ;
DANIELLS, IG .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1992, 23 (1-2) :41-59