Predicting the patient at low risk for lymph node metastasis with localized prostate cancer: An analysis of four statistical models

被引:17
作者
Spevack, L [1 ]
Killion, LT [1 ]
West, JC [1 ]
Rooker, GM [1 ]
Brewer, EA [1 ]
Cuddy, PG [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MISSOURI,ST LUKES HOSP,MIDAMER UROL ONCOL INST,KANSAS CITY,MO 64110
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1996年 / 34卷 / 03期
关键词
antigens; prostatic neoplasms; lymph node excision;
D O I
10.1016/0360-3016(95)02163-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Statistical models using preoperative Prostate-Specific Antigen, Gleason primary grade or score of the biopsy specimen, and clinical stage have been developed to predict those patients with clinically localized prostate cancer at low risk for lymph node metastasis. It has been recommended that these patients do not require pelvic lymph node dissections. Four such models were evaluated to assess their accuracy in identifying this subgroup of patients. Methods and Materials: We reviewed the records of 214 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent pelvic lymph node dissections. Data from these patients were entered into the four models. Results: Lymph node metastasis was detected in 14% of patients. The results showed the following for each of the proposed models respectively: 78, 50, 76, and 42% of the patients were identified as low risk and, hence, would be spared pelvic lymph node dissections. The false negative rates are 13 (7.8%), 5 (4.6%), 14 (8.6%), and 1 (1.1%). Sensitivities are 56.7, 83.3, 53.3, and 96.7%. Conclusions: While the pelvic lymph node dissection is the most accurate method of detecting occult nodal metastasis, statistical models can identify a cohort of low risk patients that may be spared lymphadenectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 547
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
AUSTENFELD MS, 1990, UROL CLIN N AM, V17, P867
[2]   ELIMINATING THE NEED FOR BILATERAL PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY IN SELECT PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
BLUESTEIN, DL ;
BOSTWICK, DG ;
BERGSTRALH, EJ ;
OESTERLING, JE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (05) :1315-1320
[3]   STAGING PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - RISK VERSUS BENEFIT [J].
BRENDLER, CB ;
CLEEVE, LK ;
ANDERSON, EE ;
PAULSON, DF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1980, 124 (06) :849-850
[4]  
GONZALEZ JA, 1994, 73RD ANN M S CENTR S, P109
[5]  
GRIFFITH DP, 1884, 73RD ANN M S CENT SE, P117
[6]  
HARRIS MJ, 1994, J UROLOGY, V151, P451
[7]   TECHNIQUES FOR NODAL STAGING IN PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
KAVOUSSI, LR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (05) :1324-1325
[8]   ABILITY OF PREOPERATIVE SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN VALUE TO PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL STAGE AND DNA PLOIDY - INFLUENCE OF CLINICAL STAGE AND TUMOR GRADE [J].
KLEER, E ;
LARSONKELLER, JJ ;
ZINCKE, H ;
OESTERLING, JE .
UROLOGY, 1993, 41 (03) :207-216
[9]   EXPERIENCE WITH GLEASON HISTOPATHOLOGIC GRADING IN PROSTATIC-CANCER [J].
KRAMER, SA ;
SPAHR, J ;
BRENDLER, CB ;
GLENN, JF ;
PAULSON, DF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1980, 124 (02) :223-225
[10]  
MORGAN W R, 1990, P162