Simulation of Deep-Coalbed-Methane Permeability and Production Assuming Variable Pore-Volume Compressibility

被引:24
作者
Tonnsen, R. R. [1 ]
Miskimins, J. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, Dept Petr Engn, Golden, CO 80401 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY | 2011年 / 50卷 / 05期
关键词
FLOW;
D O I
10.2118/138160-PA
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
080707 [能源环境工程]; 082001 [油气井工程];
摘要
One of the horizons of interest for future unconventional-resource development is deep- (>5,000 ft) coalbed-methane (CBM) production. Unfortunately, coal permeability is highly sensitive to changes in stress, leading to the belief of limited permeability in deep coals. However, this conclusion is generally based on the assumption of constant pore-volume (PV) compressibility of a coal's porosity/cleat system during changing stress conditions. Modelling the evolution of permeability within potential deep coal reservoirs is highly dependent on this assumption of constant or variable PV compressibility. This paper shows how this assumption affects modelled permeability changes and that permeability in deep coals may maintain much higher values during production than previously suggested. Using prior work and data, ideas are reorganized into an alternative view of deep-CBM permeability. The modelled compressibility and permeability results are then applied to the simulation of deep-CBM reservoirs to discover the practical difference of the compressibility assumption on a coal's simulated production. Simulations show significant difference in production based on the two assumptions. Application of the simulation results may provide a justification for exploration into deeper CBM reservoirs.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 31
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams [J].
Cui, XJ ;
Bustin, RM .
AAPG BULLETIN, 2005, 89 (09) :1181-1202
[2]
Flow of coal-bed methane to a gallery [J].
Gilman, A ;
Beckie, R .
TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA, 2000, 41 (01) :1-16
[3]
Gray I., 1987, RESERVOIR ENG COAL S, P28, DOI DOI 10.2118/12514-PA
[4]
HARPALANI S, 1990, SPE ANN TECHN C EXH, DOI DOI 10.2118/20729-MS
[5]
JEU SJ, 1988, SPE ANN TECHN C EXH, DOI DOI 10.2118/18253-MS
[6]
LABORATORY STUDY OF EFFECTS OF CONFINING PRESSURE ON FRACTURE FLOW AND STORAGE CAPACITY IN CARBONATE ROCKS [J].
JONES, FO .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1975, 27 (JAN) :21-27
[7]
KUUSKRAA VA, 1993, SPE GAS TECHN S CAL, DOI DOI 10.2118/26196-MS
[8]
Characteristics and origins of coal cleat: A review [J].
Laubach, SE ;
Marrett, RA ;
Olson, JE ;
Scott, AR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 1998, 35 (1-4) :175-207
[9]
Secondary porosity and permeability of coal vs. gas composition and pressure [J].
Mavor, MJ ;
Gunter, WD .
SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2006, 9 (02) :114-125
[10]
McKee C.R., 1988, SPE Form Eval, V3, P81, DOI DOI 10.2118/12858-PA