Varying efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens:: cost effectiveness study using a decision analysis model

被引:25
作者
Duggan, AE [1 ]
Tolley, K
Hawkey, CJ
Logan, RFA
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Dept Publ Hlth & Epidemiol, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Div Gastroenterol, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.316.7145.1648
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine how small differences in the efficacy and cost of two antibiotic regimens to eradicate Helicobacter pylori can affect the overall cost effectiveness of H pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer disease. Design: A decision analysis to examine the cost effectiveness of eight H pylori eradication strategies for duodenal ulcer disease with and without C-13-urea breath testing to confirm eradication. Main outcome measures: Cumulative direct treatment costs per 100 patients with duodenal ulcer disease who were positive for H pylori. Results: In model 1 the strategy of omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole alone was the most cost effective of the four strategies assessed. The addition of the C-13-urea breath test and a second course of omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole achieved the highest eradication rate (97%) but was the most expensive (pound 62.63 per patient). The cost of each additional effective eradication was pound 589.00 (incremental cost per case) when compared with the cost of treating once only with omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole; equivalent to the cost of a patient receiving ranitidine for duodenal ulcer relapse for more than 15 years. Eradication strategies of omeprazole, amoxycillin, and metronidazole were less cost effective than omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole alone. in model 2 the addition of the C-13-urea breath test after treatment, and maintenance treatment, increased die cost of all the strategies and reduced the cost advantage of omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole alone. Conclusion: Small differences in efficacy can influence the comparative cost effectiveness of strategies for eradicating H pylori Of the strategies tested the most cost effective (omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole alone) was neither the least expensive (omeprazole, amoxycillin, and metronidazole alone) nor the most effective (omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole with further treatment for patients found positive for H pylori on C-13-urea breath testing). Cost effectiveness should be an important part of choosing an eradication strategy for H pylori.
引用
收藏
页码:1648 / 1654
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
BELL GD, 1993, BR J MED EC, V6, P45
[2]   Is Helicobacter pylori eradication a cost-effective treatment of duodenal ulcer disease? [J].
Carrere, MO ;
Lamouliatte, H ;
Ruszniewski, P .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1997, 11 (03) :216-224
[3]  
Johnston BJ, 1997, GUT, V41, pA166
[4]   The decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Karlsson, G ;
Johannesson, M .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1996, 9 (02) :113-120
[5]  
LAMOULIATTE H, 1996, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V110, pA170
[6]  
LOGAN RPH, 1996, CLIN CHALLENGES GAST, P42
[7]  
MOAYYEDI P, 1995, EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT, V7, P835
[8]  
PENSTON JG, 1993, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V7, P259
[9]  
POUNDER RE, 1981, LANCET, V1, P29
[10]   COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CIMETIDINE MAINTENANCE THERAPY IN CHRONIC GASTRIC AND DUODENAL-ULCER [J].
PYM, B ;
SANDSTAD, J ;
SEVILLE, P ;
BYTH, K ;
MIDDLETON, WRJ ;
TALLEY, NJ ;
PIPER, DW .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1990, 99 (01) :27-35