Efficacy of maintenance treatment approaches for childhood overweight - A randomized controlled trial

被引:184
作者
Wilfley, Denise E.
Stein, Richard I.
Saelens, Brian E.
Mockus, Danyte S.
Matt, Georg E.
Hayden-Wade, Helen A.
Welch, R. Robinson
Schechtman, Kenneth B.
Thompson, Paul A.
Epstein, Leonard H.
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biostat, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Pediat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Childrens Hosp & Reg Med Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[6] San Diego State Univ, Joint Doctoral Program Epidemiol, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[7] San Diego State Univ, Joint Doctoral Program Clin Psychol, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[8] Child & Adolescent Serv Res Ctr, San Diego, CA USA
[9] Univ Buffalo, Dept Pediat, Buffalo, NY USA
[10] Univ Buffalo, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Buffalo, NY USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2007年 / 298卷 / 14期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.298.14.1661
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context No trials for childhood overweight have examined maintenance interventions to augment the effects of initial weight loss programs. Objectives To determine the short-term and long-term efficacy of 2 distinct weight maintenance approaches vs no continued treatment control following standard family-based behavioral weight loss treatment for childhood overweight, and to examine children's social functioning as a moderator of outcome. Design, Setting, and Participants A parallel-group, randomized controlled trial conducted between October 1999 and July 2004 in a university-based weight control clinic. Participants were 204 healthy 7- to 12-year-olds, 20% to 100% above median body mass index (BMI) for age and sex, with at least 1 overweight parent. Children enrolled in 5 months of weight loss treatment and 150 were randomized to 1 of 3 maintenance conditions. Follow-up assessments occurred immediately following maintenance treatments and 1 and 2 years following randomization. Interventions Maintenance conditions included the control group or 4 months of behavioral skills maintenance (BSM) or social facilitation maintenance (SFM) treatment. Main Outcome Measures BMI z score and percentage overweight. Results Children receiving either BSM or SFM maintained relative weight significantly better than children assigned to the control group from randomization to post-weight maintenance (P <=.01 for all; effect sizes d=0.72-0.96; mean changes in BMI z scores=-0.04, -0.04, -0.05, and 0.05 for BSM alone, SFM alone, BSM and SFM together, and the control group, respectively). Active maintenance treatment efficacy relative to the control group declined during follow-up, but the effects of SFM alone (P=.03; d=0.45; mean change in BMI z score=-0.24) and when analyzed together with BSM (P=.04; d=0.38; mean change in BMI z score=-0.22) were significantly better than the control group (mean change in BMI z score=-0.06) when examining BMI z score outcomes from baseline to 2-year follow-up. Baseline child social problem scores moderated child relative weight change from baseline to 2-year follow-up, with low social problem children in SFM vs the control group having the best outcomes. Conclusions The addition of maintenance-targeted treatment improves short-term efficacy of weight loss treatment for children relative to no maintenance treatment. However, the waning of effects over follow-up, although moderated by child initial social problems, suggests the need for the bolstering of future maintenance treatments to sustain effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1661 / 1673
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Achenbach T.M., 1991, MANUAL CHILD BEHAV C
[2]   Family environmental factors influencing the developing behavioral controls of food intake and childhood overweight [J].
Birch, LL ;
Davison, KK .
PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 48 (04) :893-+
[3]  
Bronfenbrenner U., 2007, HDB CHILD PSYCHOL, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470147658.CHPSY0114
[4]  
BryantWaugh RJ, 1996, INT J EAT DISORDER, V19, P391, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199605)19:4&lt
[5]  
391::AID-EAT6&gt
[6]  
3.0.CO
[7]  
2-G
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, POWERSTATISTICALSCIE, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[10]   What is the best measure of adiposity change in growing children:: BMI, BMI %, BMI z-score or BMI centile? [J].
Cole, TJ ;
Faith, MS ;
Pietrobelli, A ;
Heo, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2005, 59 (03) :419-425