Intravaginal brachytherapy alone for intermediate-risk endometrial cancer

被引:114
作者
Alektiar, KM
Venkatraman, E
Chi, DS
Barakat, RR
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2005年 / 62卷 / 01期
关键词
GOG#99; endometrial cancer; intermediate risk; intravaginal brachytherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.054
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Despite the results of the Gynecologic Oncology Group trial No. 99 (GOG#99), some unanswered questions still remain about the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. First, can intravaginal brachytherapy (IVRT) alone substitute for external beam RT but without added morbidity? Second, is the high-risk (HR) definition from GOG#99 a useful tool to predict pelvic recurrence specifically? The purpose of this study was to try to answer these questions in a group of patients with Stage IB-IIB endometrial carcinoma treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) IVRT alone. Methods and Materials: Between November 1987 and December 2002, 382 patients with Stage IB-IIB endometrial carcinoma were treated with simple hysterectomy followed by HDR-IVRT alone at our institution. Comprehensive surgical staging (CSS), defined as pelvic washings and pelvic/paraaortic lymph node sampling, was performed in 20% of patients. The mean age was 60 years (range, 29-92 years). Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was present in 14% of patients. The median HDR-IVRT dose was 21 Gy (range, 6-21 Gy), given in three fractions. Complications were assessed in terms of late Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (Grade 3 or worse) toxicity of the GI tract, genitourinary GU tract, and vagina. Results: With a median follow-up of 48 months, the 5-year vaginal/pelvic control rate was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93-98%). On multivariate analysis, a poor vaginal/pelvic control rate correlated with age :60 years old (relative risk [RR], 3, 95% CI, 1-12; p = 0.01), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Grade 3 (RR, 9, 95% CI, 2-35; p = 0.03), and LVI (RR, 4, 95% CI, 1-13; p = 0.051). The depth of myometrial invasion and CSS, however, were not significant. With regard to pelvic control specifically, the presence of GOG#99 HR features did not affect the pelvic control rate. The 5-year rate for HR patients was 96% (95% CI, 90-100%) vs. 96% (95% CI, 94-99%) for those without HR disease (p = 0.48). Even when the CSS effect was taken into account, the influence of HR features on pelvic control was still not significant (p = 0.51). In contrast, pelvic control was significantly influenced when patients were grouped according to CSS and stage/grade substages. For those with Stage IB Grade 3-IIB and no CSS, the 5-year pelvic control rate was 86% compared with 97% for those with Stage IB Grade 3-IIB and CSS, 97% for Stage IB, Grade 1-2 without CSS, and 100% for those with Stage IB, Grade 1-2 and CSS (p = 0.027). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 93% (95% CI, 90-96%). On multivariate analysis, poor disease-free survival correlated with age :60 years (RR, 5; 95% CI, 1-18; p = 0.002), FIGO Grade 3 (RR 5, 95% CI 2-17; p = 0.013), and LVI (RR 3, 95% CI 1- 8; p = 0.054). Unlike pelvic control, disease-free survival was significantly affected by GOG#99 HR features, with a 5-year rate of 87% (95% CI, 76-99%) vs. 94% (95% CI, 91-97%) for those without HR features (p = 0.027). The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rate was 93% and 97%, respectively. The overall 5-year actuarial rate of Grade 3 or worse complications was 1% (95% CI, 0-2%). Conclusion: Tumor grade, depth of invasion, and the use of CSS were better predictors of pelvic control than the GOG#99 HR factors. IVRT alone seemed to provide adequate tumor control with very low morbidity. Therefore, it seems prudent to consider it for intermediate-risk patients because of its superior therapeutic ratio compared with that for surgery alone or pelvic RT. Additional follow-up, however, with a larger number of patients is needed, especially for those with LVI. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 117
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
AALDERS J, 1980, OBSTET GYNECOL, V56, P419
[2]  
ABELER VM, 1991, CANCER, V67, P3093, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19910615)67:12<3093::AID-CNCR2820671226>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-L
[4]   Clinical value of immunohistochemically detected lymphovascular invasion in endometrioid endometrial cancer [J].
Alexander-Sefre, F ;
Singh, N ;
Ayhan, A ;
Thomas, JM ;
Jacobs, IJ .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 92 (02) :653-659
[5]   High-dose-rate postoperative vaginal cuff irradiation alone for stage IB and IC endometrial cancer [J].
Anderson, JM ;
Stea, B ;
Hallum, AV ;
Rogoff, E ;
Childers, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (02) :417-425
[6]   Adjuvant radiotherapy following properly staged endometrial cancer: what role? [J].
Berman, ML .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 92 (03) :737-739
[7]   GOOD OUTCOME ASSOCIATED WITH A STANDARDIZED TREATMENT PROTOCOL USING SELECTIVE POSTOPERATIVE RADIATION IN PATIENTS WITH CLINICAL STAGE-I ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE ENDOMETRIUM [J].
CAREY, MS ;
OCONNELL, GJ ;
JOHANSON, CR ;
GOODYEAR, MD ;
MURPHY, KJ ;
DAYA, DM ;
SCHEPANSKY, A ;
PELOQUIN, A ;
LUMSDEN, BJ .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1995, 57 (02) :138-144
[8]   Patterns of failure in endometrial carcinoma stage IB grade 3 and IC patients treated with postoperative vaginal vault brachytherapy [J].
Chadha, M ;
Nanavati, PJ ;
Liu, P ;
Fanning, J ;
Jacobs, A .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1999, 75 (01) :103-107
[9]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[10]   The morbidity of treatment for patients with stage I endometrial cancer:: Results from a randomized trial [J].
Creutzberg, CL ;
van Putten, WLJ ;
Koper, PC ;
Lybeert, MLM ;
Jobsen, JJ ;
Wárlám-Rodenhuis, CC ;
De Winter, KAJ ;
Lutgens, LCHW ;
van den Bergh, ACM ;
van der Steen-Banasik, E ;
Beerman, H ;
van Lent, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (05) :1246-1255