Pension wealth and household saving: Evidence from pension reforms in the United Kingdom

被引:99
作者
Attanasio, OP
Rohwedder, S
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Econ, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Inst Fiscal Studies, London WC1E 7AE, England
[3] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA 90407 USA
[4] UCL, Dept Econ, London, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1257/000282803322655419
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using three major U.K. pension reforms as natural experiments we investigate the relationship between pension saving and discretionary private savings. Unlike most differences-in-differences approaches which rely on average differences between control and treatment group, we use economic theory to model the response of each individual household. The empirical analysis, based on the Family Expenditure Survey, uses both time-series and cross-sectional variation to identify the behavioral response. The earnings-related tier of the pension scheme is found to have a negative impact on private savings with relatively high substitution elasticities; the impact of the flat-rate tier is not significantly different from zero.
引用
收藏
页码:1499 / 1521
页数:23
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] ATTANASIO OP, 2003, IN PRESS Q J EC
  • [2] ATTANASIO OP, 1998, 9815 I FISC STUD
  • [3] BANKS J, 1998, RELIABLE FAMILY EXPE
  • [4] Bernheim BD, 1997, FISCAL POLICY, P259
  • [5] Brugiavini Agar, 1987, EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE W
  • [6] INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT AND SAVINGS BEHAVIOR
    DIAMOND, PA
    HAUSMAN, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1984, 23 (1-2) : 81 - 114
  • [7] DILNOT AW, 1994, PENSION POLICY UK EC
  • [8] Pension reform and saving in Britain
    Disney, R
    Emmerson, C
    Wakefield, M
    [J]. OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2001, 17 (01) : 70 - 94
  • [9] DISNEY R, 1999, PARTNERSHIP PENSIONS
  • [10] The illusory effects of saving incentives on saving
    Engen, EM
    Gale, WG
    Scholz, JK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1996, 10 (04) : 113 - 138