Comparison of different combustion models in enclosure fire simulation

被引:107
作者
Xue, H [1 ]
Ho, JC [1 ]
Cheng, YM [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Mech & Prod Engn, Singapore 119260, Singapore
关键词
combustion model; fire; simulation; smoke concentration;
D O I
10.1016/S0379-7112(00)00043-6
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this study, three combustion models, the volumetric heat source (VHS) model, the eddy break-up model and the presumed probability density function (prePDF) model, are examined in enclosure fire simulation. The combustion models are compared and evaluated for their performance in predicting three typical enclosure fires, a room fire, a shopping mall fire and a tunnel fire. High Reynolds number turbulence k-epsilon model with buoyancy modification and the discrete transfer radiation model (DTRM) are used in the simulation. Corresponding experimental data from the literature are adopted for validation. The results show satisfactory prediction in flow patterns and features in the complex enclosure fires. However, it is shown that these combustion models are not able to show consistent performance over the different locations and enclosure fires. The needs for adequate turbulent combustion models in enclosure fires are discussed. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 54
页数:18
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Fire models and design [J].
Beard, AN .
FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 1997, 28 (02) :117-138
[2]  
CARVALHO MG, 1991, PREDICTING RAD HEAT, V160, P17
[3]   FIELD MODELING OF FIRE IN FORCED VENTILATED ENCLOSURES [J].
COX, G ;
KUMAR, S .
COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 52 (1-3) :7-23
[4]   Compartment fire experiments: Comparison with models [J].
Dembsey, NA ;
Pagni, PJ ;
Williamson, RB .
FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 1995, 25 (03) :187-227
[5]   THE ACCURACY OF COMPUTER FIRE MODELS - SOME COMPARISONS WITH EXPERIMENTAL-DATA FROM AUSTRALIA [J].
DUONG, DQ .
FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 1990, 16 (06) :415-431
[6]   Components, formulations, solutions, evaluation, and application of comprehensive combustion models [J].
Eaton, AM ;
Smoot, LD ;
Hill, SC ;
Eatough, CN .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 1999, 25 (04) :387-436
[7]  
*FLUENT INC, 1996, FLUENT 4 4 US GUID
[8]   A comparison of scalar PDF turbulent combustion models [J].
Goldin, GM ;
Menon, S .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1998, 113 (03) :442-453
[9]  
Hossain M. S., 1980, THESIS U KARLSRUHE G
[10]   CALCULATION METHODS FOR REACTING TURBULENT FLOWS - A REVIEW [J].
JONES, WP ;
WHITELAW, JH .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1982, 48 (01) :1-26