Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks

被引:481
作者
Hahn, MW [1 ]
Kern, AD
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Biol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Informat, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Populat Biol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
networks; pleiotropy; constraint; natural selection;
D O I
10.1093/molbev/msi072
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Most proteins do not evolve in isolation, but as components of complex genetic networks. Therefore, a protein's position in a network may indicate how central it is to cellular function and, hence, how constrained it is evolutionarily. To look for an effect of position on evolutionary rate, we examined the protein-protein interaction networks in three eukaryotes: yeast, worm, and fly. We find that the three networks have remarkably similar structure, such that the number of interactors per protein and the centrality of proteins in the networks have similar distributions. Proteins that have a more central position in all three networks, regardless of the number of direct interactors, evolve more slowly and are more likely to be essential for survival. Our results are thus consistent with a classic proposal of Fisher's that pleiotropy constrains evolution.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 806
页数:4
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Global organization of metabolic fluxes in the bacterium Escherichia coli [J].
Almaas, E ;
Kovács, B ;
Vicsek, T ;
Oltvai, ZN ;
Barabási, AL .
NATURE, 2004, 427 (6977) :839-843
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL
[3]   Understanding quantitative genetic variation [J].
Barton, NH ;
Keightley, PD .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2002, 3 (01) :11-21
[4]   Apparent dependence of protein evolutionary rate on number of interactions is linked to biases in protein-protein interactions data sets [J].
Bloom, JD ;
Adami, C .
BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2003, 3 (1)
[5]  
Fisher R. A., 1999, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection: A Complete Variorum Edition
[6]   Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network [J].
Fraser, HB ;
Hirsh, AE ;
Steinmetz, LM ;
Scharfe, C ;
Feldman, MW .
SCIENCE, 2002, 296 (5568) :750-752
[7]   Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome [J].
Giaever, G ;
Chu, AM ;
Ni, L ;
Connelly, C ;
Riles, L ;
Véronneau, S ;
Dow, S ;
Lucau-Danila, A ;
Anderson, K ;
André, B ;
Arkin, AP ;
Astromoff, A ;
El Bakkoury, M ;
Bangham, R ;
Benito, R ;
Brachat, S ;
Campanaro, S ;
Curtiss, M ;
Davis, K ;
Deutschbauer, A ;
Entian, KD ;
Flaherty, P ;
Foury, F ;
Garfinkel, DJ ;
Gerstein, M ;
Gotte, D ;
Güldener, U ;
Hegemann, JH ;
Hempel, S ;
Herman, Z ;
Jaramillo, DF ;
Kelly, DE ;
Kelly, SL ;
Kötter, P ;
LaBonte, D ;
Lamb, DC ;
Lan, N ;
Liang, H ;
Liao, H ;
Liu, L ;
Luo, CY ;
Lussier, M ;
Mao, R ;
Menard, P ;
Ooi, SL ;
Revuelta, JL ;
Roberts, CJ ;
Rose, M ;
Ross-Macdonald, P ;
Scherens, B .
NATURE, 2002, 418 (6896) :387-391
[8]   A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster [J].
Giot, L ;
Bader, JS ;
Brouwer, C ;
Chaudhuri, A ;
Kuang, B ;
Li, Y ;
Hao, YL ;
Ooi, CE ;
Godwin, B ;
Vitols, E ;
Vijayadamodar, G ;
Pochart, P ;
Machineni, H ;
Welsh, M ;
Kong, Y ;
Zerhusen, B ;
Malcolm, R ;
Varrone, Z ;
Collis, A ;
Minto, M ;
Burgess, S ;
McDaniel, L ;
Stimpson, E ;
Spriggs, F ;
Williams, J ;
Neurath, K ;
Ioime, N ;
Agee, M ;
Voss, E ;
Furtak, K ;
Renzulli, R ;
Aanensen, N ;
Carrolla, S ;
Bickelhaupt, E ;
Lazovatsky, Y ;
DaSilva, A ;
Zhong, J ;
Stanyon, CA ;
Finley, RL ;
White, KP ;
Braverman, M ;
Jarvie, T ;
Gold, S ;
Leach, M ;
Knight, J ;
Shimkets, RA ;
McKenna, MP ;
Chant, J ;
Rothberg, JM .
SCIENCE, 2003, 302 (5651) :1727-1736
[9]   Molecular evolution in large genetic networks: Does connectivity equal constraint? [J].
Hahn, MW ;
Conant, GC ;
Wagner, A .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, 2004, 58 (02) :203-211
[10]   Protein dispensability and rate of evolution [J].
Hirsh, AE ;
Fraser, HB .
NATURE, 2001, 411 (6841) :1046-1049