Calibrated probabilistic forecasting using ensemble model output statistics and minimum CRPS estimation

被引:757
作者
Gneiting, T [1 ]
Raftery, AE [1 ]
Westveld, AH [1 ]
Goldman, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Stat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1175/MWR2904.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Ensemble prediction systems typically show positive spread-error correlation, but they are subject to forecast bias and dispersion errors, and are therefore uncalibrated. This work proposes the use of ensemble model output statistics (EMOS), an easy-to-implement postprocessing technique that addresses both forecast bias and underdispersion and takes into account the spread-skill relationship. The technique is based on multiple linear regression and is akin to the superensemble approach that has traditionally been used for deterministic-style forecasts. The EMOS technique yields probabilistic forecasts that take the form of Gaussian predictive probability density functions (PDFs) for continuous weather variables and can be applied to gridded model output. The EMOS predictive mean is a bias-corrected weighted average of the ensemble member forecasts, with coefficients that can be interpreted in terms of the relative contributions of the member models to the ensemble, and provides a highly competitive deterministic-style forecast. The EMOS predictive variance is a linear function of the ensemble variance. For fitting the EMOS coefficients, the method of minimum continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) estimation is introduced. This technique finds the coefficient values that optimize the CRPS for the training data. The EMOS technique was applied to 48-h forecasts of sea level pressure and surface temperature over the North American Pacific Northwest in spring 2000, using the University of Washington mesoscale ensemble. When compared to the bias-corrected ensemble, deterministic-style EMOS forecasts of sea level pressure had root-mean-square error 9% less and mean absolute error 7% less. The EMOS predictive PDFs were sharp, and much better calibrated than the raw ensemble or the bias-corrected ensemble.
引用
收藏
页码:1098 / 1118
页数:21
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Anderson JL, 1996, J CLIMATE, V9, P1518, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<1518:AMFPAE>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]  
Atger F, 2003, MON WEATHER REV, V131, P1509, DOI 10.1175//1520-0493(2003)131<1509:SAIVOT>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   RATES OF CONVERGENCE FOR MINIMUM CONTRAST ESTIMATORS [J].
BIRGE, L ;
MASSART, P .
PROBABILITY THEORY AND RELATED FIELDS, 1993, 97 (1-2) :113-150
[6]   STATISTICAL-THEORY - THE PREQUENTIAL APPROACH [J].
DAWID, AP .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1984, 147 :278-292
[7]   FORMULATION OF GAUSSIAN PROBABILITY FORECASTS BASED ON MODEL EXTENDED-RANGE INTEGRATIONS [J].
DEQUE, M ;
ROYER, JF ;
STROE, R .
TELLUS SERIES A-DYNAMIC METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1994, 46 (01) :52-65
[8]  
Eckel FA, 1998, WEATHER FORECAST, V13, P1132, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013<1132:CPQPFB>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]  
ECKEL FA, 2003, THESIS U WASHINGTON