Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury

被引:149
作者
Shukla, Dhaval [2 ]
Devi, B. Indira [2 ]
Agrawal, Amit [1 ]
机构
[1] Maharishi Markandeshwar Univ, MM Inst Med Sci & Res, Dept Neurosurg, Mullana Ambala 133203, Haryana, India
[2] Natl Inst Mental Hlth & Neurosci, Dept Neurosurg, Bangalore 560029, Karnataka, India
关键词
Outcome scales; Traumatic brain injury; Rehabilitation; Disability; Neuropsychological assessment; DISABILITY RATING-SCALE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COMMUNITY INTEGRATION QUESTIONNAIRE; SEVERE HEAD-INJURY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; REHABILITATION; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; HANDICAP; QOLIBRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.02.013
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Traumatic brain injury (TB!) is a major public health problem resulting in death and disabilities of young and productive people. Though the mortality of TBI has decreased substantially in recent years the disability due to TBI has not appreciably reduced. Various outcome scales have been proposed and used to assess disability after TBI. A few, commonly used are Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) with or without extended scores, Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ), and the Functional Status Examination (FSE). These scales assess disability resulting from physical and cognitive impairments. For patients with good physical recovery a cognitive and neuropsychological outcome measure is required. Such measures include Neurobehavioural Function Inventory and specific neuropsychological tests like Rey Complex Figure for visuoconstruction and memory, Controlled Oral Word Association for verbal fluency, Symbol Digit Modalities (verbal) for sustained attention and Grooved Pegboard for fine motor dexterity. A more holistic and complete outcome measure is Quality of Life (QOL). Disease specific QOL measure for TB!, Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) has also been recently proposed. The problems with outcome measures include poor operational definitions, lack of sensitivity or low ceiling effects, inability to evaluate patients who cannot report, lack of integration of morbidity and mortality categories, and limited domains of functioning assessed. GOSE-E satisfies most of the criteria of good outcome scale and in combination with neuropsychological tests is a near complete instrument for assessment of outcome after TBI. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 441
页数:7
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Bowers D.N., 1989, ARCH PHYS MED REHABI, V70, pA58
[2]   Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury:: Results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury [J].
Carroll, LJ ;
Cassidy, JD ;
Peloso, PM ;
Borg, J ;
von Holst, H ;
Holm, L ;
Paniak, C ;
Pépin, M .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2004, 36 :84-105
[3]   Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury [J].
Cicerone, KD ;
Mott, T ;
Azulay, J ;
Friel, JC .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 85 (06) :943-950
[4]   Evaluation of the home and community-based services brain injury MEDICAID WAIVER PROGRAMME in Colorado [J].
Cusick, CP ;
Gerhart, KA ;
Mellick, D ;
Breese, P ;
Towle, V ;
Whiteneck, GG .
BRAIN INJURY, 2003, 17 (11) :931-945
[5]   The use of proxies in community integration research [J].
Cusick, CP ;
Brooks, CA ;
Whiteneck, GG .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 82 (08) :1018-1024
[6]   Participant-proxy reliability in traumatic brain injury outcome research [J].
Cusick, CP ;
Gerhart, KA ;
Mellick, DC .
JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2000, 15 (01) :739-749
[8]  
Dijkers M., 2007, Brain injury medicine, P225
[9]   Reporting on reliability and validity of outcome measures in medical rehabilitation research [J].
Dijkers, MPJM ;
Kropp, GC ;
Esper, RM ;
Yavuzer, G ;
Cullen, N ;
Bakdalieh, Y .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2002, 24 (16) :819-827
[10]   Functional status examination: A new instrument for assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury [J].
Dikmen, S ;
Machamer, J ;
Miller, B ;
Doctor, J ;
Temkin, N .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2001, 18 (02) :127-140