Midvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty:: a randomized, double-blinded study on early rehabilitation

被引:60
作者
Bathis, H
Perlick, L
Blum, C
Lüring, C
Perlick, C
Grifka, J
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Dept Orthopaed Surg, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Aarhus Kommune Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
total knee arthroplasty; midvastus approach; proprioception; strength; randomized controlled trial;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-004-0574-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The medial parapatellar approach has become the standard technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, recent studies have reported superior results regarding functional recovery when using the midvastus approach. It was the aim of this study to evaluate the early functional outcome of both surgical techniques. In a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study, 50 patients for TKA were consecutively operated on either by the medial parapatellar or the midvastus approach. Exclusion criteria were defined as previous open knee surgery and leg deformity of more than 10 degrees varus or valgus. TKA was performed in all patients by ' one surgeon using the same type of implants in both groups. Pain scores (VAS) were documented and follow-up data including quadriceps strength and proprioception were obtained 3 weeks and 6 weeks postoperatively. Both groups were comparable in preoperative demographic data. Postoperatively, patients in the midvastus group demonstrated significantly lower pain in rest (VAS: mean 2.25 vs. 3.03) and under movement (VAS: mean 2.92 vs. 3.13). Further, they showed superior isometric quadriceps strength at 3 weeks (41.4 vs. 27.6 Nm) and 6 weeks (47.6 vs. 35.5 Nm). Moreover, this group showed a superior postoperative proprioception, while the range of motion was similar in both groups. The midvastus approach offers advantages over the standard parapatellar arthrotomy, in the early rehabilitation period. No adverse effects were observed associated with this approach. Therefore, the midvastus approach should be considered as a valuable alternative in TKA.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 550
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
Ammeen, 1996, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R
[2]
[Anonymous], CLIN ORTHOPAEDICS
[3]
[Anonymous], CLIN ORTHOP
[4]
LONG-TERM COMPLICATIONS AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY WITH OR WITHOUT RESURFACING OF THE PATELLA [J].
BOYD, AD ;
EWALD, FC ;
THOMAS, WH ;
POSS, R ;
SLEDGE, CB .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (05) :674-681
[5]
Brick GW, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V231, P163
[6]
Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty [J].
Cila, E ;
Güzel, V ;
Özalay, M ;
Tan, J ;
Simsek, SA ;
Kanath, U ;
Öztürk, A .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2002, 122 (02) :65-68
[7]
Midvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty - A description and a cadaveric study determining the distance of the popliteal artery from the patellar margin of the incision [J].
Cooper, RE ;
Trinidad, G ;
Buck, WR .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1999, 14 (04) :505-508
[8]
A comparison of the midvastus and paramedian approaches for total knee arthroplasty [J].
Dalury, DF ;
Jiranek, WA .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1999, 14 (01) :33-37
[9]
A midvastus muscle-splitting approach for total knee arthroplasty [J].
Engh, GA ;
Holt, BT ;
Parks, NL .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1997, 12 (03) :322-331
[10]
Faure B T, 1993, J Arthroplasty, V8, P511