Pharmacoeconomic modeling of lorazepam, midazolam, and propofol for continuous sedation in critically ill patients

被引:17
作者
MacLaren, R
Sullivan, PW
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Pharm, Dept Clin Pharm, Denver, CO 80262 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Pharmaceut Outcomes Res Program, Denver, CO 80262 USA
来源
PHARMACOTHERAPY | 2005年 / 25卷 / 10期
关键词
critical care; sedation; lorazepam; midazolam; propofol; pharmacoeconomics; cost-analyses; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; LONG-TERM SEDATION; MECHANICAL VENTILATION; CONTINUOUS-INFUSION; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; PLUS MIDAZOLAM; ICU SEDATION; COST; SURGERY; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1592/phco.2005.25.10.1319
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Study Objective. To compare the expected costs of short-, intermediate-, and long-term sedation (< 24, 24-72, and > 72 hrs, respectively) with propofol, lorazepam, and midazolam in an intensive care unit. Methods. Decision-analysis models were constructed for each sedative and each duration by using institutional costs associated with drug administration and adverse events (including personnel time). Costs were A expressed in 2002 U.S. dollars. Adverse events were agitation, hypertriglyceridemia and/or pancreatitis, hypotension, nutritional changes, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and prolonged awakening and/or extubation. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched to obtain durations of sedation, the incidence of outcomes, and cost estimates of outcomes. The ability to maintain specific levels of sedation was assumed equivalent among the sedatives. Univariate sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the cost-driving variables, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted by using second-order Monte Carlo simulations. Results. Weighted mean durations of sedation from 50 studies were 13.46 (short term), 45.27 (intermediate term), and 119.78 (long term) hours. Expected costs for sedation with lorazepam, midazolam, and propofol, respectively, were $497, $294, and $272 short term; $932, $587, and $674 intermediate term; and $1604, $1737, and $2033 long term. Propofol was least costly in 86% of the short-term simulations, midazolam was least costly in 97.5% of the intermediate-term simulations, and lorazepam was least costly in 84% of the long-term simulations. The most important cost-driver for all sedatives was drug cost. Prolonged extubation after sedation was an important cost-driver for lorazepam and midazolam, especially as sedation was lengthened. Conclusion. Propofol, midazolam, and lorazepam had the lowest expected costs for short-, intermediate-, and long-term sedation, respectively. Many factors aside from drug costs influenced the cost of sedation.
引用
收藏
页码:1319 / 1328
页数:10
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM FOR SEDATION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS [J].
AITKENHEAD, AR ;
WILLATTS, SM ;
PARK, GR ;
COLLINS, CH ;
LEDINGHAM, IM ;
PEPPERMAN, ML ;
COATES, PD ;
BODENHAM, AR ;
SMITH, MB ;
WALLACE, PGM .
LANCET, 1989, 2 (8665) :704-709
[2]   Economic evaluation of propofol for sedation of patients admitted to intensive care units [J].
Anis, AH ;
Wang, XH ;
Leon, H ;
Hall, R .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 96 (01) :196-201
[3]  
[Anonymous], J DRUG DEV S3
[4]  
[Anonymous], J DRUG DEV S3
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, J CLIN OUTCOMES MANA
[6]  
[Anonymous], CONS PRIC IND MED CA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1991, J DRUG DEV
[8]   Relationship of continuous infusion lorazepam to serum propylene glycol concentration in critically ill adults [J].
Arroliga, AC ;
Shehab, N ;
McCarthy, K ;
Gonzales, JP .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (08) :1709-1714
[9]   Propofol dosing regimens for ICU sedation based upon an integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model [J].
Barr, J ;
Egan, TD ;
Sandoval, NF ;
Zomorodi, K ;
Cohane, C ;
Gambus, PL ;
Shafer, SL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 95 (02) :324-333
[10]   A double-blind, randomized comparison of IV lorazepam versus midazolam for sedation of ICU patients via a pharmacologic model [J].
Barr, J ;
Zomorodi, K ;
Bertaccini, EJ ;
Shafer, SL ;
Geller, E .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 95 (02) :286-298