Current status of kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1994-2003

被引:104
作者
Danovitch, GM [1 ]
Cohen, DJ
Weir, MR
Stock, PG
Bennett, WM
Christensen, LL
Sung, RS
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] NW Renal Clin, Portland, OR USA
[6] Univ Renal Res & Educ Assoc, Sci Registry Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Sci Registry Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
deceased donors; graft survival; kidney transplantation; kidney-pancreas transplantation; living donors; organ donation; pancreas transplantation; patient survival; SRTR; waiting list;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6135.2005.00835.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This article reviews the OPTN/SRTR data collected on kidney and pancreas transplantation during 2003 in the context of trends over the past decade. Overall, the transplant community continued to struggle to meet the increasing demand for kidney and pancreas transplantation. The number of new wait-listed kidney registrants under the age of 50 has remained relatively stable since 1994, but the number of new registrants aged 50 to 64 has doubled. However, there was only a 2.3% increase in the total number of kidney transplants performed in 2003. Expanded criteria donor kidneys made up 20% of all recovered kidneys and 16% of all transplants performed, compared with 15% in the prior year. In May 2003, new rules were implemented to promote equity in kidney organ allocation. These changes seem to have improved access for historically disadvantaged groups, though they have reduced the quality of HLA matching. The effects on long-term outcomes have yet to be measured. Although the majority of SPK recipients are white (82%), the percentage of simultaneous kidney-pancreas recipients who are African-American has increased from 9% in 2000 to 16% in 2003. The percentage of Hispanic/Latino recipients increased from 5% to 9% over the same period.
引用
收藏
页码:904 / 915
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Cecka M, 2004, AM J TRANSPLANT, V4, P322
  • [2] Danovitch G, 2003, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V14, p431A
  • [3] Allocation of deceased donor kidneys: Past, present, and future
    Danovitch, GM
    Cecka, JM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2003, 42 (05) : 882 - 890
  • [4] Waiting time or wasted time? The case for using time on dialysis to determine waiting time in the allocation of cadaveric kidneys
    Danovitch, GM
    Cohen, B
    Smits, JMA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 2 (10) : 891 - 893
  • [5] Transplant data: sources, collection and research considerations, 2004
    Dickinson, DM
    Dykstra, DM
    Levine, GN
    Li, SQ
    Welch, JC
    Webb, RL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (04) : 850 - 861
  • [6] Distant DA, 2004, AM J TRANSPLANT, V4, P303
  • [7] Kidney and pancreas transplantation
    Gaston, RS
    Alveranga, DY
    Becker, BN
    Distant, DA
    Held, PJ
    Bragg-Gresham, JL
    Humar, A
    Ting, A
    Wynn, JJ
    Leichtman, AB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 3 : 64 - 77
  • [8] Gruessner RWG, 2004, AM J TRANSPLANT, V4, P582
  • [9] Guidinger MK, 2004, AM J TRANSPLANT, V4, P160
  • [10] Pediatric transplantation
    Magee, JC
    Bucuvalas, JC
    Farmer, DG
    Harmon, WE
    Hulbert-Shearon, TE
    Mendeloff, EN
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 54 - 71