Nucleotide variation in wild and inbred mice

被引:82
作者
Salcedo, Tovah [1 ]
Geraldes, Armando [1 ]
Nachman, Michael W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1534/genetics.107.079988
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The house mouse is a well-established model organism, particularly for studying the genetics of complex traits. However, most studies of mice use classical inbred strains, whose genomes derive from multiple species. Relatively little is known about the distribtion of genetic variation among these species or how variation among strains relates to variation in the wild. We sequenced intronic regions of five X-linked loci in large samples of wild Mus domesticus and M. musculus, and we found low levels nucleotide diversity in both species. We compared these data to published data from shortportions of six X-linked and 18 autosomal loci in wild mice. We estimate that. M. domesticus and M. musculus diverged < 500,000 years ago. Consistent with this recent: divergence, some gene genealogies were reciprocally monophyletic between these species, while others were paraphyletic or polyphyletic. In general, the X chromosome was more differentiated than the autosomes. We resequenced classical inbred strains for all 29 loci and found that inbred strains contain only a small amount of the genetic variation seen in wild mice. Notably, the X chromosome contains proportionalely less variation among inbred strains than do the autosomes. Moreover, variation among inbred strains derives from differences between species as well as Front differences Within species, and these proportions differ in different genomic regions. Wild mice thus provide a reservoir of additional genetic variation that may be useful for mapping Studies. Together these results suggest that Mid mice will be a valuable complement to laboratory strains for studying the genetics of complex traits.
引用
收藏
页码:2277 / 2291
页数:15
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ARLEQUIN SOFTWARE PO
[2]   Genome-wide variation in the human and fruitfly: a comparison [J].
Aquadro, CF ;
DuMont, VB ;
Reed, FA .
CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 11 (06) :627-634
[3]   BIOCHEMICAL-COMPARISON OF MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX-MOLECULES FROM DIFFERENT SUBSPECIES OF MUS-MUSCULUS - EVIDENCE FOR TRANS-SPECIFIC EVOLUTION OF ALLELES [J].
ARDEN, B ;
KLEIN, J .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1982, 79 (07) :2342-2346
[4]   Low frequency of t haplotypes in natural populations of house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) [J].
Ardlie, KG ;
Silver, LM .
EVOLUTION, 1998, 52 (04) :1185-1196
[5]   THE HOUSE MOUSE PROGRESSION IN EURASIA - A PALEONTOLOGICAL AND ARCHAEOZOOLOGICAL APPROACH [J].
AUFFRAY, JC ;
VANLERBERGHE, F ;
BRITTONDAVIDIAN, J .
BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1990, 41 (1-3) :13-25
[6]  
Avise John C., 1994, pi
[7]   Reduced X-linked diversity in derived populations of house mice [J].
Baines, John F. ;
Harr, Bettina .
GENETICS, 2007, 175 (04) :1911-1921
[8]   Origin and radiation of the house mouse: Mitochondrial DNA phylogeny [J].
Boursot, P ;
Din, W ;
Anand, R ;
Darviche, D ;
Dod, B ;
VonDeimling, F ;
Talwar, GP ;
Bonhomme, F .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 1996, 9 (04) :391-415
[9]   Mouse SNPs for evolutionary biology: Beware of ascertainment biases [J].
Boursot, Pierre ;
Belkhir, Khalid .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2006, 16 (10) :1191-1192
[10]   THE HITCHHIKING EFFECT ON THE SITE FREQUENCY-SPECTRUM OF DNA POLYMORPHISMS [J].
BRAVERMAN, JM ;
HUDSON, RR ;
KAPLAN, NL ;
LANGLEY, CH ;
STEPHAN, W .
GENETICS, 1995, 140 (02) :783-796