Sample size evaluation for a multiply matched case-control study using the score test from a conditional logistic (discrete Cox PH) regression model

被引:42
作者
Lachin, John M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Ctr Biostat, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Ctr Biostat, Dept Stat, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
关键词
sample size; power; conditional logistic model; Cox proportional hazards model; multiple matching; case-control study; nested case-control study;
D O I
10.1002/sim.3057
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The conditional logistic regression model (Biometrics 1982; 38:661-672) provides a convenient method for the assessment of qualitative or quantitative covariate effects on risk in a study with matched sets, each containing a possibly different number of cases and controls. The conditional logistic likelihood is identical to the stratified Cox proportional hazards model likelihood, with an adjustment for ties (J. R. Stat. Soc. B 1972; 34:187-220). This likelihood also applies to a nested case-control study with multiply matched cases and controls, selected from those at risk at selected event times. Herein the distribution of the score test for the effect of a covariate in the model is used to derive simple equations to describe the power of the test to detect a coefficient theta (log odds ratio or log hazard ratio) or the number of cases (or matched sets) and controls required to provide a desired level of power. Additional expressions are derived for a quantitative covariate as a function of the difference in the assumed mean covariate values among cases and controls and for a qualitative covariate in terms of the difference in the probabilities of exposure for cases and controls. Examples are presented for a nested case-control study and a multiply matched case-control study. Copyright (C) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2509 / 2523
页数:15
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Applied Logistic Regression
[2]   Sample size calculations for failure time random variables in non-randomized studies [J].
Bernardo, MVP ;
Lipsitz, SR ;
Harrington, DP ;
Catalano, PJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 2000, 49 :31-40
[3]   Comparative impact of multiple biomarkers and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in the context of conventional risk factors for the prediction of recurrent cardiovascular events in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study [J].
Blankenberg, Stefan ;
McQueen, Matthew J. ;
Smieja, Marek ;
Pogue, Janice ;
Balion, Cynthia ;
Lonn, Eva ;
Rupprecht, Hans J. ;
Bickel, Christoph ;
Tiret, Laurence ;
Cambien, Francois ;
Gerstein, Hertzel ;
Muenzel, Thomas ;
Yusuf, Salim .
CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (03) :201-208
[4]   COVARIANCE ADJUSTMENT OF RELATIVE-RISK ESTIMATES IN MATCHED STUDIES [J].
BRESLOW, N .
BIOMETRICS, 1982, 38 (03) :661-672
[5]   Case-cohort and case-control analysis with Cox's model [J].
Chen, K ;
Lo, SH .
BIOMETRIKA, 1999, 86 (04) :755-764
[6]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[7]   Power and sample size for matched case-control studies [J].
Ejigou, A .
BIOMETRICS, 1996, 52 (03) :925-933
[8]   ASYMPTOTIC THEORY FOR NESTED CASE-CONTROL SAMPLING IN THE COX REGRESSION-MODEL [J].
GOLDSTEIN, L ;
LANGHOLZ, B .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1992, 20 (04) :1903-1928
[9]   Sample-size calculations for the Cox proportional hazards regression model with nonbinary covariates [J].
Hsieh, FY ;
Lavori, PW .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2000, 21 (06) :552-560
[10]  
Lachin JM, 2000, WILEY SER PROB STAT