Costs of Integrating Economics and Conservation Planning

被引:50
作者
Arponen, Anni [1 ]
Cabeza, Mar [1 ,2 ]
Eklund, Johanna [1 ]
Kujala, Heini [1 ]
Lehtomaki, Joona [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Metapopulat Res Grp, Dept Biosci, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] CSIC, Natl Museum Nat Sci, Dept Biodivers & Evolutionary Biol, Biodivers & Global Change Lab, ES-28006 Madrid, Spain
关键词
conservation prioritization; cost data; cost-effectiveness; cost-efficiency; ecological-economic modeling; opportunism; datos de costos; modelado ecologico-economico; oportunismo; priorizacion de la conservacion; rentabilidad; RESERVE SELECTION; BIODIVERSITY; GROWTH; OPPORTUNISM; ALGORITHMS; REPRESENTATION; OPTIMALITY; MANAGEMENT; NETWORKS; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01539.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Recent literature on systematic conservation planning has focused strongly on economics. It is a necessary component of efficient conservation planning because the question is about effective resource allocation. Nevertheless, there is an increasing tendency toward economic factors overriding biological considerations. Focusing too narrowly on economic cost may lead us back toward solutions resembling those obtained by opportunistic choice of areas, the avoidance of which was the motivation for development of systematic approaches. Moreover, there are many overlooked difficulties in incorporating economic considerations reliably into conservation planning because available economic data and the free market are complex. For instance, economies based on free markets tend to be shortsighted, whereas biodiversity conservation aims far into the future. Although economic data are necessary, they should not be relied on too heavily or considered separately from other sociopolitical factors. We suggest focusing on development of more-comprehensive ecological-economic modeling, while not forgetting the importance of purely biological analyses that are needed as a point of reference for evaluating conservation outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1198 / 1204
页数:7
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, WORLD DEV IND DAT
[2]   The bias of complementarity hotspots toward marginal populations [J].
Araújo, MB ;
Williams, PH .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2001, 15 (06) :1710-1720
[3]   Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation [J].
Armsworth, PR ;
Daily, GC ;
Kareiva, P ;
Sanchirico, JN .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (14) :5403-5408
[4]   The value of biodiversity in reserve selection: Representation, species weighting, and benefit functions [J].
Arponen, A ;
Heikkinen, RK ;
Thomas, CD ;
Moilanen, A .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (06) :2009-2014
[5]   Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs [J].
Balmford, A ;
Gaston, KJ ;
Blyth, S ;
James, A ;
Kapos, V .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (03) :1046-1050
[6]   Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group [J].
Bode, Michael ;
Wilson, Kerrie A. ;
Brooks, Thomas M. ;
Turner, Will R. ;
Mittermeier, Russell A. ;
McBride, Marissa F. ;
Underwood, Emma C. ;
Possingham, Hugh P. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (17) :6498-6501
[7]   Selection criteria of protected forest areas in Europe: The theory and the real world [J].
Branquart, Etienne ;
Verheyen, Kris ;
Latham, James .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2008, 141 (11) :2795-2806
[8]   Conservation, neoliberalism, and social science:: a critical reflection on the SCB 2007 annual meeting in South Africa [J].
Buscher, Bram E. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2008, 22 (02) :229-231
[9]   Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity [J].
Cabeza, M ;
Moilanen, A .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2001, 16 (05) :242-248
[10]   Site-selection algorithms and habitat loss [J].
Cabeza, M ;
Moilanen, A .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2003, 17 (05) :1402-1413