Randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing two doses of arzoxifene (LY353381) in hormone-sensitive advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients

被引:39
作者
Baselga, J
Llombart-Cussac, A
Bellet, M
Guillem-Porta, V
Enas, N
Krejcy, K
Carrasco, E
Kayitalire, L
Kuta, M
Lluch, A
Vodvarka, P
Kerbrat, P
Namer, M
Petruzelka, L
机构
[1] Vall Hebron Univ Hosp, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[2] Inst Valenciano Oncol, Valencia, Spain
[3] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[4] Eli Lilly & Co, Vienna, Austria
[5] Eli Lilly & Co, Madrid, Spain
[6] Eli Lilly & Co, Suresnes, France
[7] Nemocnice Chomutov, Chomutov, Czech Republic
[8] Hosp Clin Univ, Valencia, Spain
[9] Fak Nemocnice S Poliklin, Ostrava, Czech Republic
[10] Ctr Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France
[11] Ctr Antoine Lacassagne, F-06054 Nice, France
[12] Charles Univ Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
arzoxifene; breast cancer; LY353381; selective estrogen receptor modulator;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdg368
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This randomized, double-blind, phase II study assessed two doses of the selective estrogen receptor modulator arzoxifene in women with advanced breast cancer. The primary end point was to choose the best of two doses of arzoxifene based on the response rate or the clinical benefit rate (CBR). Pharmacokinetics and toxicities were also assessed. Patients and methods: Ninety-two patients with advanced breast cancer received arzoxifene 20 or 50 mg/day. Tumor response was assessed using World Health Organization criteria. Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) system. Pharmacokinetic data were analyzed using the NONMEM(R) software program (GloboMax, Hanover, MD, USA). Results: Response rates in the 20 mg arm were numerically higher than the 50-mg arm according to the investigator (40.5% versus 36.4%) and the independent review panel (42.9% versus 27.3%). CBR was higher in the 20 mg arm according to the investigator (64.3% versus 61.4%) and the independent review panel (59.5% versus 47.7%). Arzoxifene was well tolerated. There were no study drug-related deaths. Mean observed steady-state plasma concentrations of arzoxifene were 3.62 and 7.48 ng/ml for the 20 and 50 mg doses, respectively. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in efficacy or safety between 20 and 50 mg of arzoxifene. Accordingly, arzoxifene 20 mg/day was selected for further study in patients with breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1383 / 1390
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Barakat R R, 1995, Oncology (Williston Park), V9, P129
  • [2] Anastrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in 668 postmenopausal women:: Results of the tamoxifen or arimidex randomized group efficacy and tolerability study
    Bonneterre, J
    Thürlimann, B
    Robertson, JFR
    Krzakowski, M
    Mauriac, L
    Koralewski, P
    Vergote, I
    Webster, A
    Steinberg, M
    von Euler, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (22) : 3748 - 3757
  • [3] BRYANT HU, 1996, J SOC GYNECOL INVEST, V3, pA152, DOI DOI 10.1016/1071-5576(96)82635-9
  • [4] BRYANT HU, 1997, P END SOC ANN M MINN
  • [5] ENDOMETRIAL CANCER IN TAMOXIFEN-TREATED BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS - FINDINGS FROM THE NATIONAL SURGICAL ADJUVANT BREAST AND BOWEL PROJECT (NSABP) B-14
    FISHER, B
    COSTANTINO, JP
    REDMOND, CK
    FISHER, ER
    WICKERHAM, DL
    CRONIN, WM
    BOWMAN, D
    COUTURE, J
    DIMITROV, NV
    EVANS, J
    FARRAR, W
    KAVANAH, M
    LICKLEY, HL
    MARGOLESE, R
    PATERSON, AHG
    ROBIDOUX, A
    SHIBATA, H
    TERZ, J
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1994, 86 (07): : 527 - 537
  • [6] Gibbons J. D., 1977, SELECTING ORDERING P
  • [7] HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY AND ENDOMETRIAL CANCER RISK - A METAANALYSIS
    GRADY, D
    GEBRETSADIK, T
    KERLIKOWSKE, K
    ERNSTER, V
    PETITTI, D
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 85 (02) : 304 - 313
  • [8] The third-generation non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors: A review of their clinical benefits in the second-line hormonal treatment of advanced breast cancer
    Hamilton, A
    Piccart, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 (04) : 377 - 384
  • [9] TAMOXIFEN AND THROMBOEMBOLISM
    HENDRICK, A
    SUBRAMANIAN, VP
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1980, 243 (06): : 514 - 515
  • [10] Drug therapy - Treatment of breast cancer
    Hortobagyi, GN
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (14) : 974 - 984