Psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes: controlled trial and comparative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial

被引:103
作者
Eborall, Helen C. [1 ]
Griffin, Simon J.
Prevost, A. Toby
Kinmonth, Ann-Louise
French, David P.
Sutton, Stephen
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Gen Practice & Primary Care Res Unit, Cambridge CB2 0SR, England
[2] Strangeways Res Lab, MRC, Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge CB1 4RN, England
[3] Coventry Univ, Appl Res Ctr Hlth & Lifestyle Intervent, Coventry, W Midlands, England
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2007年 / 335卷 / 7618期
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.39303.723449.55
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To quantify the psychological impact of primary care based stepwise screening for type 2 diabetes. Design Controlled trial and comparative study embedded in a randomised controlled trial. Setting 15 practices (10 screening, five control) in the ADDITION (Cambridge) trial in the east of England. Participants 7380 adults (aged 40-69) in the top fourth for risk of having undiagnosed type 2 diabetes (6416 invited for screening, 964 controls). Interventions Invited for screening for type 2 diabetes or not invited (controls), incorporating a comparative study of subgroups of screening attenders. Attenders completed questionnaires after a random blood glucose test and at 3-6 months and 12-15 months later. Controls were sent questionnaires at corresponding time points. Non-attenders were sent questionnaires at 3-6 months and 12-15 months. Main outcome measures State anxiety (Spietberger state anxiety inventory), anxiety and depression (hospital anxiety and depression scale), worry about diabetes, and self rated health. Results No significant differences were found between the screening and control participants at any time-for example, difference in means (95% confidence intervals) for state anxiety after the initial blood glucose test was -0.53, -2.60 to 1.54, at 3-6 months was 1.51 (-0.17 to 3.20), and at 12-15 months was 0.57, -1.11 to 2.24. After the initial test, compared with participants who screened negative, those who screened positive reported significantly poorer general health (difference in means -0.19, -0.25 to -0.13), higher state anxiety (0.93, -0.02 to 1.88), higher depression (0.32, 0.08 to 0.56), and higher worry about diabetes (0.25, 0.09 to 0.41), although effect sizes were small. Small but significant trends were found for self rated health across the screening subgroups at 3-6 months (P=0.047) and for worry about diabetes across the screen negative groups at 3-6 months and 12-15 months (P=0.001). Conclusions Screening for type 2 diabetes has limited psychological impact on patients. Implementing a national screening programme based on the stepwise screening procedure used in the ADDITION (Cambridge) trial is unlikely to have significant consequences for patients' psychological health.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 489
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   The psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes [J].
Adriaanse, MC ;
Snoek, FJ .
DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2006, 22 (01) :20-25
[2]   No substantial psychological impact of the diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes following targeted population screening: The Hoorn Screening Study [J].
Adriaanse, MC ;
Snoek, FJ ;
Dekker, JM ;
Spijkerman, AMW ;
Nijpels, G ;
Twisk, JWR ;
van der Ploeg, HM ;
Heine, RJ .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2004, 21 (09) :992-998
[3]   Changes in psychological distress after cancer genetic counselling: a comparison of affected and unaffected women [J].
Bish, A ;
Sutton, S ;
Jacobs, C ;
Levene, S ;
Ramirez, A ;
Hodgson, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 86 (01) :43-50
[4]  
Cohen J, 1989, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[5]  
*DIAB SERV ADV COM, 1993, REC MAN DIAB PRIM CA
[6]  
EBORALL HC, IN PRESS PATIENTS EX
[7]   Impact of diabetes screening on quality of life [J].
Edelman, D ;
Olsen, MK ;
Dudley, TK ;
Harris, AC ;
Oddone, EZ .
DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (06) :1022-1026
[8]   The impact of screening for Type 2 diabetes in siblings of patients with established diabetes [J].
Farmer, AJ ;
Doll, H ;
Levy, JC ;
Salkovskis, PM .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2003, 20 (12) :996-1004
[9]   Psychological costs of inadequate cervical smear test results [J].
French, DP ;
Maissi, E ;
Marteau, TM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (11) :1887-1892
[10]  
Griffin SJ, 2000, DIABETES-METAB RES, V16, P164, DOI 10.1002/1520-7560(200005/06)16:3<164::AID-DMRR103>3.0.CO