Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?

被引:100
作者
Wessely, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll, Sch Med, Dept Psychol Med, London SE5 8AF, England
[2] Inst Psychiat, London SE5 8AF, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11129-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 305
页数:5
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   THE PREDICTIVE ABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW OF GRANT PROPOSALS - THE CASE OF ECOLOGY AND THE UNITED-STATES-NATIONAL-SCIENCE-FOUNDATION [J].
ABRAMS, PA .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 1991, 21 (01) :111-132
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1982, JUDGMENT UNCERTAINTY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, LONGITUDE
[4]  
BUNCH DS, 1989, METHOD INFORM MED, V28, P168
[5]   CONSOLATION FOR THE SCIENTIST - SOMETIMES IT IS HARD TO PUBLISH PAPERS THAT ARE LATER HIGHLY-CITED [J].
CAMPANARIO, JM .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 1993, 23 (02) :342-362
[6]  
Carter GM, 1978, R2229NIH RAND
[7]  
Chubin D. E., 1990, Peerless science
[8]   THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION [J].
CICCHETTI, DV .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1991, 14 (01) :119-134
[9]  
Cole S., 1992, Making science: Between nature and society
[10]   QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION OF PEER-REVIEW OF PROGRAM PROJECT AND CENTER APPLICATIONS IN ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY [J].
DAS, NK ;
FROEHLICH, LA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1985, 5 (04) :220-227