A standardized quality assessment system to evaluate incontinence care in the nursing home

被引:36
作者
Schnelle, JF
Cadogan, MP
Grbic, D
Bates-jensen, BM
Osterweil, D
Yoshii, J
Simmons, SF
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Borun Ctr Gerontol Res, Los Angeles Jewish Home Aging, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Div Geriatr, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Vet Adm Hosp, Sepulveda, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Nursing, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Novi Sad, Serbia
关键词
quality assessment; urinary incontinence;
D O I
10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51560.x
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives: To demonstrate the reliability and feasibility of a standardized protocol to assess and score urinary incontinence care in nursing homes. Design: Descriptive. Setting: Eighteen nursing homes (NHs). Participants: Four hundred twenty-six incontinent residents. Measurements: Resident interview data were used to score three quality indicators, and usable data were retrieved from 117 (27%) of 426 incontinent residents in 18 homes who were selected for interview based on evidence that they could accurately describe the care they received. Medical record data were used to score six quality indicators for a subset of 58 participants in five homes. Results: Zero to 98% of the participants were scored as receiving care consistent with the intent of the indicator across the nine indicators. All NHs failed to provide chart documentation of an assessment to determine an incontinent resident's appropriateness for a scheduled toileting program (0% passed). The absence of an assessment to determine a resident's potential responsiveness to toileting assistance may explain why 103 incontinent residents who were documented on the Minimum Data Set as being on a scheduled toileting program reported that they received the same number of toileting assists per day (1.3) as the group of 114 incontinent residents who were not on a scheduled toileting program (1.0). The received toileting assistance frequencies reported by both groups were too low to maintain continence. Conclusion: The standardized quality assessment system generated scores for nine incontinence quality indicators with good interrater reliability and provided explicit scoring rules that can facilitate replication. The focus of the indicators on care processes that are under the control of NH staff make the protocol useful for external survey and internal quality improvement purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:1754 / 1761
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
*AM MED DIR ASS, 1996, UR INC CLIN PRACT GU
[2]   ACOVE quality indicators [J].
不详 .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 135 (08) :653-667
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, AHCPR PUBLICATION
[4]  
Kane RA, 2003, J GERONTOL A-BIOL, V58, P240
[5]  
OUSLANDER JG, 1995, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V273, P1366
[6]   Prompted voiding for nighttime incontinence in nursing homes: Is it effective? [J].
Ouslander, JG ;
Al-Samarrai, N ;
Schnelle, JF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2001, 49 (06) :706-709
[7]   URINARY-INCONTINENCE IN ELDERLY NURSING-HOME PATIENTS [J].
OUSLANDER, JG ;
KANE, RL ;
ABRASS, IB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1982, 248 (10) :1194-1198
[8]   Indicators of the quality of nursing home residential care [J].
Saliba, D ;
Schnelle, JF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2002, 50 (08) :1421-1430
[9]  
SALIBA D, 2002, PUBLICATION RAND INC, V2
[10]  
SALIBA D, 2002, PUBLICATION RAND AFF, V4