Simulating cold season snowpack: Impacts of snow albedo and multi-layer snow physics

被引:34
作者
Waliser, D. [2 ]
Kim, J. [1 ]
Xue, Y. [1 ]
Chao, Y. [2 ]
Eldering, A. [2 ]
Fovell, R. [1 ]
Hall, A. [1 ]
Li, Q. [1 ]
Liou, K. N. [1 ]
McWilliams, J. [1 ]
Kapnick, S. [1 ]
Vasic, R. [1 ,3 ]
De Sale, F. [1 ]
Yu, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] JPL CALTECH, Pasadena, CA USA
[3] Natl Ctr Environm Predict, Silver Spring, MD USA
关键词
CLIMATE-CHANGE; SPECTRAL ALBEDO; SIERRA-NEVADA; UNITED-STATES; MODEL; SURFACE; COVER; SOIL; RUNOFF; SCHEME;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-011-0312-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study used numerical experiments to investigate two important concerns in simulating the cold season snowpack: the impact of the alterations of snow albedo due to anthropogenic aerosol deposition on snowpack and the treatment of snow physics using a multi-layer snow model. The snow albedo component considered qualitatively future changes in anthropogenic emissions and the subsequent increase or decrease of black carbon deposition on the Sierra Nevada snowpack by altering the prescribed snow albedo values. The alterations in the snow albedo primarily affect the snowpack via surface energy budget with little impact on precipitation. It was found that a decrease in snow albedo (by as little as 5-10% of the reference values) due to an increase in local emissions enhances snowmelt and runoff (by as much as 30-50%) in the early part of a cold season, resulting in reduced snowmelt-driven runoff (by as much as 30-50%) in the later part of the cold season, with the greatest impacts at higher elevations. An increase in snow albedo associated with reduced anthropogenic emissions results in the opposite effects. Thus, the most notable impact of the decrease in snow albedo is to enhance early-season snowmelt and to reduce late-season snowmelt, resulting in an adverse impact on warm season water resources in California. The timing of the sensitivity of snow water equivalent (SWE), snowmelt, and runoff vary systematically according to terrain elevation; as terrain elevation increases, the peak response of these fields occurs later in the cold season. The response of SWE and surface energy budget to the alterations in snow albedo found in this study shows that the effects of snow albedo on snowpack are further enhanced via local snow-albedo feedback. Results from this experiment suggest that a reduction in local emissions, which would increase snow albedo, could alleviate the early snowmelt and reduced runoff in late winter and early spring caused by global climate change, at least partially. The most serious uncertainties associated with this part of the study are a quantification of the relationship between the amount of black carbon deposition and snow albedo-a subject of future study. The comparison of the spring snowpack simulated with a single- and multi-layer snow model during the spring of 1998 shows that a more realistic treatment of snow physics in a multi-layer snow model could improve snowpack simulations, especially during spring when snow ablation is significant, or in conjunction with climate change projections.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 117
页数:23
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] Anderson E., 1976, A Point Energy and Mass Balance Model of a Snow Cover
  • [2] Simulation of high-latitude hydrological processes in the Torne-Kalix basin: PILPS phase 2(e) - 1: Experiment description and summary intercomparisons
    Bowling, LC
    Lettenmaier, DP
    Nijssen, B
    Graham, LP
    Clark, DB
    El Maayar, M
    Essery, R
    Goers, S
    Gusev, YM
    Habets, F
    van den Hurk, B
    Jin, JM
    Kahan, D
    Lohmann, D
    Ma, XY
    Mahanama, S
    Mocko, D
    Nasonova, O
    Niu, GY
    Samuelsson, P
    Shmakin, AB
    Takata, K
    Verseghy, D
    Viterbo, P
    Xia, YL
    Xue, YK
    Yang, ZL
    [J]. GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2003, 38 (1-2) : 1 - 30
  • [3] Climate change scenarios for the California region
    Cayan, Daniel R.
    Maurer, Edwin P.
    Dettinger, Michael D.
    Tyree, Mary
    Hayhoe, Katharine
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2008, 87 (Suppl 1) : S21 - S42
  • [4] Chang S, 1999, J APPL METEOROL, V38, P405, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<0405:VSOTCM>2.0.CO
  • [5] 2
  • [6] The Common Land Model
    Dai, YJ
    Zeng, XB
    Dickinson, RE
    Baker, I
    Bonan, GB
    Bosilovich, MG
    Denning, AS
    Dirmeyer, PA
    Houser, PR
    Niu, GY
    Oleson, KW
    Schlosser, CA
    Yang, ZL
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 84 (08) : 1013 - 1023
  • [7] DUDHIA J, 1989, J ATMOS SCI, V46, P3077, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046<3077:NSOCOD>2.0.CO
  • [8] 2
  • [9] Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model
    Ek, MB
    Mitchell, KE
    Lin, Y
    Rogers, E
    Grunmann, P
    Koren, V
    Gayno, G
    Tarpley, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D22)
  • [10] Springtime warming and reduced snow cover from carbonaceous particles
    Flanner, M. G.
    Zender, C. S.
    Hess, P. G.
    Mahowald, N. M.
    Painter, T. H.
    Ramanathan, V.
    Rasch, P. J.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2009, 9 (07) : 2481 - 2497