Endosonography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis

被引:297
作者
Wiersema, MJ
Wiersema, LM
机构
[1] ST VINCENT HOSP & HLTH CARE CTR, DEPT MED, INDIANAPOLIS, IN USA
[2] ST VINCENT HOSP & HLTH CARE CTR, DEPT PATHOL, INDIANAPOLIS, IN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(96)70047-0
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We have evaluated the safety and efficacy of performing endosonography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS CPN) in patients with pain due to intra-abdominal malignancies. Methods: Thirty patients with upper abdominal pain requiring narcotic analgesia and suspected or known intra-abdominal malignancy were selected for EUS CPN. This group included 25 patients with pancreas carcinoma and 5 patients with intra-abdominal metastases. Using the linear array ultrasound endoscope and a prototype needle catheter, transgastric injection of the celiac plexus with bupivacaine and 98% dehydrated absolute alcohol was accomplished. Results: Pain scopes were significantly lower compared with baseline at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after EUS CPN (median follow-up: 10 weeks). At these follow-up intervals, 82% to 91% of patients required the same or less pain medication and 79% to 88% of patients had persistent improvement in their pain score. Comparison of patients with TXNXM1 versus TXNXM0 pancreatic carcinoma revealed higher initial pain scores (7.9 +/- 1.92 versus 5.8 +/- 2.0, p = .02) and a greater decline in pain scares (decrease of 6.1 +/- 3.1 versus 4.8 +/- 2.0, p = .004). Complications were minor and consisted of transient diarrhea in four patients. Conclusion: EUS CPN is a safe and effective means for improving pain control in patients with intra-abdominal malignancy. The technique may be performed as an outpatient at the same setting as the EUS staging examination.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 662
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
*AG HLTH CAR POL R, 1994, MAN CANC PAIN
[2]
[Anonymous], 1985, Cancer, V56, P2563
[3]
PREOPERATIVE STAGING OF GASTRIC-CANCER - COMPARISON OF ENDOSCOPIC US AND DYNAMIC CT [J].
BOTET, JF ;
LIGHTDALE, CJ ;
ZAUBER, AG ;
GERDES, H ;
WINAWER, SJ ;
URMACHER, C ;
BRENNAN, MF .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (02) :426-432
[4]
PREOPERATIVE STAGING OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER - COMPARISON OF ENDOSCOPIC US AND DYNAMIC CT [J].
BOTET, JF ;
LIGHTDALE, CJ ;
ZAUBER, AG ;
GERDES, H ;
URMACHER, C ;
BRENNAN, MF .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (02) :419-425
[5]
BROWN BW, 1977, STATISTICS BIOMEDICA, P327
[6]
BROWN DL, 1987, ANESTH ANALG, V66, P869
[7]
THE MANAGEMENT OF CANCER PAIN [J].
CHERNY, NI ;
PORTENOY, RK .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1994, 44 (05) :262-303
[8]
PARAPLEGIA FOLLOWING CELIAC PLEXUS BLOCK [J].
DECONNO, F ;
CARACENI, A ;
ALDRIGHETTI, L ;
MAGNANI, G ;
FERLA, G ;
COMI, G ;
VENTAFRIDDA, V .
PAIN, 1993, 55 (03) :383-385
[9]
SPINAL WADA TEST [J].
DOPPMAN, JL ;
GIRTON, M ;
OLDFIELD, EH .
RADIOLOGY, 1986, 161 (02) :319-321
[10]
A COMPARISON OF THE HOPKINS PAIN RATING INSTRUMENT WITH STANDARD VISUAL ANALOG AND VERBAL DESCRIPTOR SCALES IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER PAIN [J].
GROSSMAN, SA ;
SHEIDLER, VR ;
MCGUIRE, DB ;
GEER, C ;
SANTOR, D ;
PIANTADOSI, S .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1992, 7 (04) :196-203